2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2012.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical issues in state estimation using particle filters: Case studies with polymer reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this equation, the vectors x k-1 are the initial guesses or the prior estimates and v k is the uncertainty of the evolution model taken as a normal distribution, such that v k ~ N(0, s 2 m ). After developing the computational code, the following conditions were analyzed: a) Analysis of the number of particles (N p ): according to Shenoy et al (2013) and Chen, Morris and Martin (2005), the proper choice of the number of particles can improve the performance of the filter as much as the non-degeneration of the particles. But, high N p can result in high computational cost.…”
Section: Particle Filter Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this equation, the vectors x k-1 are the initial guesses or the prior estimates and v k is the uncertainty of the evolution model taken as a normal distribution, such that v k ~ N(0, s 2 m ). After developing the computational code, the following conditions were analyzed: a) Analysis of the number of particles (N p ): according to Shenoy et al (2013) and Chen, Morris and Martin (2005), the proper choice of the number of particles can improve the performance of the filter as much as the non-degeneration of the particles. But, high N p can result in high computational cost.…”
Section: Particle Filter Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFs have received attention since the early 2000s to approximate estimation problems (Doucet et al, 2000;Arulampalam et al, 2002;Chen et al, 2008;Shao et al, 2010;Khatibisepehr et al, 2013). For example, Shenoy et al (2013) compared the EKF, UKF and PF for polymerization processes, which are highly nonlinear systems, and observed that PFs delivered more accurate estimates. The main reason is that the PF algorithms are indicated for nonlinear and non-Gaussian systems, as is the case of industrial applications (Chen et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can cause the plant to operate outside of the desired conditions and, consequently, impair the product quality, process safety and final cost. One way to minimize the effects of uncertainty and lack of instruments is to use virtual sensors …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo based approaches uses a significantly large number of random samples to represent the underlying densities. While this choice potentially yields a superior representation of the underlying densities, the computational burden for propagating the samples through the process models is excessively large and these approaches are often impractical for online implementation [15]. On the other hand, the Unscented Transformation (UT) [1] based approaches use a limited but deterministic choice of 2n + 1 samples (n -dimension of state vector), known as sigma points, to capture moments of the non-Gaussian densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%