2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10778-014-0613-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical Stability of a Moving Robot with Respect to Given Domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After Kamenkov's introduction, the concept of FTS was developed in the sixties in [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In the following years, several other results were proposed on this topic using the alternative terms of stability over finite interval or practical stability [12][13][14][15]. However, most of the techniques presented in that period both for the analysis [16][17][18] and for the design of finite-time stable control systems [19,20] were computationally cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After Kamenkov's introduction, the concept of FTS was developed in the sixties in [6][7][8][9][10][11]. In the following years, several other results were proposed on this topic using the alternative terms of stability over finite interval or practical stability [12][13][14][15]. However, most of the techniques presented in that period both for the analysis [16][17][18] and for the design of finite-time stable control systems [19,20] were computationally cumbersome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of stability are addressed in [2,3,10]. These types of stability were also used in [13] to solve specific problems of robotics. Grujic [7,8] proposed the concept of finite-time stability with fixed settling time, which is important for many problems of automatic control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%