The accreditation process of a nursing program requires self-assessment, peer evaluation, and identifying areas of improvement. In 2008, the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) began offering a 10-year accreditation with a Continuous Improvement Progress Report (CIPR) at the fifth year. This article focuses on an in-depth analysis of a system in which the school of nursing utilized an ad hoc committee to complete the CIPR. Reports generated by the ad hoc committee concluded that need for improvement was warranted related to policy review. An action plan for continuous compliance generated implementation of policy software and the creation of an academic support specialist position. An ad hoc committee completed the CIPR rather than paying faculty overload hours; policy was an exemplar. Faculty development, team performance, and accountability resulted in a plan for continual compliance that can be adopted in other nursing schools to meet CCNE accreditation.Keywords nursing, behavioral sciences, academics, education, social sciences, educational administration, leadership, and policy, educational measurement and assessment, management education, management 2 SAGE Open p. 18). The CCNE standards were revised in 2013 and became effective on January 1, 2014 (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2015). In response to the newly revised standards, it was determined based on program growth that an aggressive approach to adoption needed to be the plan of action. The practical aspects of accomplishing this plan of action are limited in the literature (Lewallen, 2015).Since 2009, our program has demonstrated significant growth, including modification from a four-to a five-semester program. In addition, enrollment has now essentially doubled with admissions of about 60 students each fall and spring semesters. The number of faculty has increased by nine, most of whom have never been involved in a CIPR self-study. It was decided to make the self-study an ongoing process. As a result of this decision, it was determined there was a need to revise the program effectiveness plan (PEP) to demonstrate continuous evaluation. As the CIPR report needed to be written utilizing newly published standards, an Accreditation and Policy/Procedure Ad Hoc Committee was established to complete this task.
BackgroundOver the past 30 years, the SON has maintained accreditation status with positive outcomes. The school has grown in the number of students and admission cycles as well as course and graduate offerings. The SON found that what worked in the past for the accreditation process needed to be altered based on the changes in the size and strategic plan of the SON and the university. Current practices needed to change from an informal review to a more formal review.Historically, the SON had relied heavily on two writers for preparation of the CIPR. It was typical for one senior faculty member to be given workload release to assist the dean in this process. The traditional preparation for the report included an ex...