2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practical toolkit for monitoring endoscope reprocessing effectiveness: Identification of viable bacteria on gastroscopes, colonoscopes, and bronchoscopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After sterilization, 100% of ureteroscopes had protein contamination and 13% had microbial growth . Inadequate reprocessing described in this study and others can expose patients to contaminated endoscopes …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…After sterilization, 100% of ureteroscopes had protein contamination and 13% had microbial growth . Inadequate reprocessing described in this study and others can expose patients to contaminated endoscopes …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Ofstead et al [7][8][9] have conducted prospective studies that evaluated effectiveness of bronchoscope reprocessing in 5 hospitals in the United States. Microbial growth was detected on 23 of 35 bronchoscopes (65.7%), and 10 bronchoscopes (28.6%) harbored high-concern organisms or actionable levels of microbial growth (>100 CFU) ( Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial growth was detected on 23 of 35 bronchoscopes (65.7%), and 10 bronchoscopes (28.6%) harbored high-concern organisms or actionable levels of microbial growth (>100 CFU) ( Table 1). [7][8][9] Mold and gram-negative bacteria were detected, including S. maltophilia, Sphingomonas phyllosphaerae, and Escherichia coli/Shigella. At one hospital, high protein levels were detected in 7 of 8 bronchoscopes, indicating that manual cleaning failed to remove soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations