2012
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp12x641627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice accreditation: the European perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being accredited and legitimized pushed health centers to follow approaches of high-performing accredited health centers. However, accreditation in the primary care sector is generally seen as a tool for assessing and benchmarking the performances of healthcare settings across a wide range of clinical and organizational domains (Lester et al, 2012;Pomey et al, 2010;Rajan et al, 2015). On the other hand, uncertainty and limited resources encouraged health centers to practice "shortcut" approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being accredited and legitimized pushed health centers to follow approaches of high-performing accredited health centers. However, accreditation in the primary care sector is generally seen as a tool for assessing and benchmarking the performances of healthcare settings across a wide range of clinical and organizational domains (Lester et al, 2012;Pomey et al, 2010;Rajan et al, 2015). On the other hand, uncertainty and limited resources encouraged health centers to practice "shortcut" approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 The situation elsewhere in Europe is similar. 45 Rurally-based doctors suffer from loneliness and personal isolation; in addition, both rural GPs and single-handed GPs frequently feel professionally isolated. 26,44 GPs working in single-handed practices tend to suffer from higher stress levels than those who don't.…”
Section: Implications For Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these tools were based on hospital-based quality frameworks, such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) approach, healthcare-specific accreditation (such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations—JCAHO from the USA) and the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) approach ( 8 ). Other tools have been originally developed for primary care, such as the European Practice Assessment tool and the Dutch Practice Accreditation Scheme ( 9 , 10 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%