Practice-based Research Networks at the Crossroads of Research Translation

Nagykáldi, Zsolt

doi:10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140263

Cited by 11 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Through their broader impact on healthcare, policy, and education, members may have also accelerated innovation transfer to other practices. [203][204][205][206][207] Based on our findings, we formulated 5 levels of member engagement on the research participation continuum (see Table 3), including literature-concordant "research leaders," "network champions," "regular collaborators," "advisors," and "informed research-product users." The latter describes practitioners who are influenced by PBRN activity passively ("listeners").…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) have developed dynamically across the world, paralleling the emergence of the primary care discipline. While this review focuses on the internal environment of PBRNs, the complete framework will be presented incrementally in future publications.Methods: We conducted a scoping review of the published and gray literature. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), OVID, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, and SAGE Premier, were searched for publications between January 1, 1965 and December 31, 2020 for English-language articles. Rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria were implemented to identify relevant publications, and inductive thematic analysis was applied to elucidate key elements, subthemes, and themes. Social network theory was used to synthesize findings.Results: A total of 229 publications described the establishment of 93 PBRNs in 15 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The overall framework yielded 3 main themes, 12 subthemes, and 57 key elements. Key PBRN activities included relationship building between academia and practitioners and development of a learning environment through multidirectional communication.Conclusions: PBRNs across many countries contributed significantly to shaping the landscape of primary health care and became an integral part of it. Many common features within the sphere of PBRNs can be identified that seem to promote their establishment across the world.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, in the USA, practice‐based research (PBR) was established in 1986 as pediatric research in office settings (PROS) . Practice‐based research solves clinical questions from daily practice, involving community practitioners and academic researchers . Eventually, physicians could acquire research methodology .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pediatric directors’ perception of clinical research education in Japan

Teruya

Takase

2020

Pediatrics International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Pediatric clinical research in Japan has declined recently, and a new policy requiring manuscripts of residents for the pediatric board examination was established in 2017. However, pediatric faculties appear to be confused about research education in residencies. Methods: Questionnaires on research activities in residencies were distributed during the spring of 2018 to 500 pediatric directors in all educational hospitals in Japan. We collected data and performed statistical analyses: principal component analysis, multivariate analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons. Results: We received 252 (50.4%) responses and analyzed 243 (61 academic hospitals, 27 children's hospitals, 151 community hospitals, and 4 unknown). About 137 (56.4%) of them supported the new policy. There were three main contentious points on attitudes to pediatric research among respondents: passion for research, particularity about disease research, and public spirit. There was a difference in passion for research between academics and non-academics. A difference in pride in particular research was observed between PhDs and MDs. Differences in public spirit were not associated with scholarly degrees or hospital type. Conclusions: To promote research education in residencies, pediatric faculties should confirm and share the aim that pediatricians should be scientific physicians with a research mentality developed through research activities and should notice social problems. Through research education, pediatric residents could approach the five outcomes for pediatricians provided by the Japan Pediatric Society: being general physicians, child healthcare supporters, advocates for children, scholars, and professionals.

show abstract

“…First, there is emerging evidence that patients whose healthcare providers or institutions participate in research experience better processes of care and improved outcomes [ 12 – 15 ]. Second, there is an evolving consensus that an increase in the implementation of evidence into practice will require the promotion of more practice-based evidence [ 16 , 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The research activities of Ontario’s large community acute care hospitals: a scoping review

DiDiodato

McKee

2017

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundOntario’s large community hospitals (LCHs) provide care to 65% of the province’s hospitalized patients, yet we know very little about their research activities. By searching for research publications from 2013 to 2015, we will describe the extent, type and collaborative nature of Ontario’s LCHs’ research activities.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review by searching PubMed, Embase and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases from January 1, 2013 until December 31, 2015 for all publication types whose author(s) was affiliated with any of the 44 LCHs. Articles were screened and abstracted by three reviewers, independently. The data were charted and results described using summary statistics, scatter plots, and bar charts.ResultsWe included 798 publications from 39 LCHs and 454 authors. The median number of publications was 7 (Interquartile range (IQR) 23). Observational study design was most commonly reported in over 50% of publications. Program evaluation was the focus in 40% of publications. Primary LCH authorship was observed for 535 publications. Over 25% and 65% of the publications were attributable to 24 authors and 9 LCHs, respectively. There was minimal collaboration both within (21.2%) and between (7.8%) LCHs. LCH size and geographic proximity to academic hospitals had minimal impact on research activity.ConclusionsOntario’s LCHs publish infrequently, collaborate infrequently, and their role in translational research activity is not well defined. A future survey questionnaire to LCH researchers identified through this review is planned to both validate and elicit their interpretations of our study findings and opinions about LCH involvement in research.

show abstract

Practice-based Research Networks at the Crossroads of Research Translation

Cited by 11 publications

References 19 publications

A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

Pediatric directors’ perception of clinical research education in Japan

The research activities of Ontario’s large community acute care hospitals: a scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About