2018
DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1551865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice educators’ attitudes and perspectives of interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional practice learning for students: A mixed-methods case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The starting point for much of the theoretical and empirical research in this area is the dimensions and features of the 'active and ongoing partnership' that D'Amour et al [15] referred to or active boundary work referred to by Schot et al [17]. Research that has explored the dimensions of inter-disciplinary working points to a number of recurring themes including informal communications, co-location, shared processes and policies, shared knowledge creation, understanding of each other roles and responsibilities, professional hierarchies and power relations, and shared clinical decision making [7,8,16,23,25,28,29]. Repeated opportunity for effective, frequent, reciprocal informal communication emerges as the single most important and tangible observable output of interprofessional collaboration [16].…”
Section: Theory Adapting: the Social Process Of Inter-disciplinary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting point for much of the theoretical and empirical research in this area is the dimensions and features of the 'active and ongoing partnership' that D'Amour et al [15] referred to or active boundary work referred to by Schot et al [17]. Research that has explored the dimensions of inter-disciplinary working points to a number of recurring themes including informal communications, co-location, shared processes and policies, shared knowledge creation, understanding of each other roles and responsibilities, professional hierarchies and power relations, and shared clinical decision making [7,8,16,23,25,28,29]. Repeated opportunity for effective, frequent, reciprocal informal communication emerges as the single most important and tangible observable output of interprofessional collaboration [16].…”
Section: Theory Adapting: the Social Process Of Inter-disciplinary Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas percepciones de estatus y poder profesional tienen un impacto negativo en el trabajo interprofesional, ya que merma el compromiso con los equipos. En este sentido, la importancia de la identidad profesional abierta y la cultura profesional flexible son claves para el éxito de los equipos interprofesionales (Vyt, 2017;O'Carroll, 2017;Marks, 2017).…”
Section: La Intervención Interprofesional Como Campo De Estudiounclassified