2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice effects and the use of alternate forms in serial neuropsychological testing

Abstract: Accurate understanding of practice characteristics, performance stability, and error on neuropsychological tests is essential to both valid clinical assessment and maximization of signal detection for clinical trials of cognitive enhancing drugs. We examined practice effects in 28 healthy adults. As part of a larger study using donepezil and simulating a Phase I trial, participants were randomized into: placebo, no-treatment and donepezil. Donepezil results are presented elsewhere. Neuropsychological tests wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
225
3
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
16
225
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When performing serial testing to evaluate deterioration or improvement in cognitive functioning, it is of crucial importance to understand the relationship between earlier and later test administrations. Indeed, a serious problem in serial testing is that varying test results may occur even when there was no true change in the cognitive status of a person (Beglinger et al, 2005). This problem is mainly attributable to the less than perfect temporal stability of test scores and the occurrence of test-retest effects such as practice effects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performing serial testing to evaluate deterioration or improvement in cognitive functioning, it is of crucial importance to understand the relationship between earlier and later test administrations. Indeed, a serious problem in serial testing is that varying test results may occur even when there was no true change in the cognitive status of a person (Beglinger et al, 2005). This problem is mainly attributable to the less than perfect temporal stability of test scores and the occurrence of test-retest effects such as practice effects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternate forms (A-F) were used to minimize practice effects. 6,8 A list of 12 words (4 words from each of 3 semantic categories) were presented, and the subject was asked to recall as many words as possible in any order. After a 20-minute delay, the subject was asked to recall the words once again (ie, delayed recall).…”
Section: Outcome Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 This can be somewhat ameliorated by the use of alternate forms 8 and, since the largest practice effects typically occur between the first and second testing, 21 preexposure to the measures (ie, dual baselines) are recommended. 6,69 For this study, we used 6 separate versions of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, and incorporated a practice testing session at the time of the screening interview to lessen early practice effects. Despite our attempts to limit practice effects (using alternate forms, conducting a prebaseline practice session), these effects cannot be completely eliminated when subjects are tested repeatedly over a brief period.…”
Section: Outcome Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, such data could inform the design and interpretation of drug trials for this prodromal phase of dementia (Beglinger et al, 2005a). For example, it is necessary to know whether some degree of practice effects are expected in amnestic MCI participants before initiation of a drug.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%