2017
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice guideline: Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing

Abstract: Objective: To systematically review the evidence and make recommendations with regard to diagnostic utility of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP and oVEMP, respectively). Four questions were asked: Does cVEMP accurately identify superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS)? Does oVEMP accurately identify SCDS? For suspected vestibular symptoms, does cVEMP/oVEMP accurately identify vestibular dysfunction related to the saccule/utricle? For vestibular symptoms, does cVEMP/oVEMP accura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, VEMP responses are frequently absent in older adults, and the significance of this is not fully understood [90]. A recent position paper from the American Academy of Neurology stated that the clinical utility of VEMPs at present is best characterized for the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome and other inner ear third window conditions [24]. As such, the PVP Classification Committee decided to exclude otolith impairment from the PVP diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, VEMP responses are frequently absent in older adults, and the significance of this is not fully understood [90]. A recent position paper from the American Academy of Neurology stated that the clinical utility of VEMPs at present is best characterized for the diagnosis of superior canal dehiscence syndrome and other inner ear third window conditions [24]. As such, the PVP Classification Committee decided to exclude otolith impairment from the PVP diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Laboratory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related conditions often involve simultaneous impairment of multiple organ systems, as well as a reduced ability to compensate for physiologic losses[23,24]. In this context, PVP likely occurs simultaneously with other sensory and functional losses (specifically visual, proprioceptive, lower extremity strength, cortical, extrapyramidal, cerebellar),[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] which…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are short-latency responses from the saccule that are observed after stimulation of the inner ear (at 500-Hz repetitive tone bursts) [67,68]. The sound stimulus delivered to the external auditory canal results in stimulation of the sensory cells of the saccular macula.…”
Section: Diagnostic Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Szyjne miogenne przedsionkowe potencjały wywołane (cVEMP, cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials) to krótkolatencyjne odpowiedzi z woreczka, jakie występują po stymulacji ucha wewnętrznego powtarzalnymi trzaskami o częstotliwości 500 Hz [67,68]. Bodziec dźwiękowy podawany do przewodu słuchowego zewnętrznego powoduje pobudzenie komórek zmysłowych plamki woreczka.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Recently, a renewed interest emerged for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), utilized for testing short-latency myogenic responses evoked by sound stimulation of vestibular system [ 8 ]. Specifically, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) represent the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle response to sound activation of saccule and signal transmission via the vestibulospinal tract.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%