2006
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000227183.21314.cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice Parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review) [RETIRED]

Abstract: Abstract-Objective:To systematically review outcomes in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: The authors analyzed studies (1966 to 2006) that explored predictors of death or unconsciousness after 1 month or unconsciousness or severe disability after 6 months. Results: The authors identified four class I studies, three class II studies, and five class III studies on clinical findings and circumstances.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

15
889
4
36

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,160 publications
(944 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
15
889
4
36
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to TTM, the “gold standard” for early prediction of neurologic outcomes was the 2006 American Academy of Neurology practice parameter, comprising 6 physical examination and diagnostic test findings on post‐arrest days 1 to 3, each with reported positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for poor neurologic outcome 10. However, validity in the TTM population has been repeatedly questioned because of decreased individual and composite PPV 11, 12, 13.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy might be caused by the presence of variable anoxic/hypoxic damage to the architecture of brain motor pathways in PHM patients. This damage may pave the way for a variety of mechanisms in which cortical generalized PHM can occur 3, 7, 33. For example, in some cases, a generalized jerk could arise from seizures wherein generalized ictal discharges act as the cortical source of PHM 33, 34.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized PHM has been correlated with poor outcome in PAE and included as prognosticator of poor outcome in the American postanoxic coma guideline 1, 3. It is thought that the CM or SM represents the localization of anoxic brain decay in PHM patients 8, 33, 34, 35.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chance of neurologically intact survival from cardiac arrest remains low despite significant advances in clinical care, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and treatment with therapeutic hypothermia. Less than half of those with return to spontaneous circulation survive to hospital discharge and 20%–30% of the survivors are neurologically devastated (Bisschops et al., 2011; Wijdicks et al., 2006). Seizures have been reported in 10%–12% of the survivors and have been shown to be an independent risk factor for mortality (Arnoldus & Lammers, 1995; Celesia, Grigg, & Ross, 1988; Fugate et al., 2010; Harper & Wilkes, 1991; Hui et al., 2005; Kawai, Thapalia, & Verma, 2011; Krumholz, Stern, & Weiss, 1988; Mani et al., 2012; Rabinstein & Wijdicks, 2012; Rossetti et al., 2007; Wijdicks, Parisi, & Sharbrough, 1994; Young, Jordan, & Doig, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%