2015
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1022147
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice, problems and power in ‘internationalisation at home’: critical reflections on recent research evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been associated with a drive to increase outbound mobility (Crowther et al 2000;Clifford 2011), and to ensure opportunities are available for students to develop globally relevant skills. These broader conceptions arise from the belief that universities are obligated to make all of their students aware of their role as global citizens in an increasingly internationalised, multicultural world and to prepare them for success in the global labour market (Clifford 2009(Clifford , 2011Sanderson 2011;Hayden 2013;Harrison 2015;Leask 2015). While these new initiatives are still driven by market demands, there is a greater breadth to current understandings of IOC, and with this come significant implications for the practices of learning and teaching, curriculum design, and delivery.…”
Section: Institutional Drivers and Implementation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has been associated with a drive to increase outbound mobility (Crowther et al 2000;Clifford 2011), and to ensure opportunities are available for students to develop globally relevant skills. These broader conceptions arise from the belief that universities are obligated to make all of their students aware of their role as global citizens in an increasingly internationalised, multicultural world and to prepare them for success in the global labour market (Clifford 2009(Clifford , 2011Sanderson 2011;Hayden 2013;Harrison 2015;Leask 2015). While these new initiatives are still driven by market demands, there is a greater breadth to current understandings of IOC, and with this come significant implications for the practices of learning and teaching, curriculum design, and delivery.…”
Section: Institutional Drivers and Implementation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variation across an institution in understanding is significant and suggests not only the limits of engagement with institutional strategy but also the existence of multiple and diverse local cultures of internationalisation. Discussion about IOC as a strand of the internationalisation of higher education goes as far back in the literature as the 1990s (van der Wende 1997), and although it is now recognised as an important and growing aspect, there is still no consensus on a definition (Bell 2004;Clifford 2009;Green and Whitsed 2012;Hayden 2013;Harrison 2015), or an identified "best approach" to IOC in practice in all contexts (De Vita and Case 2003;Green and Whitsed 2012;Leask 2013). Bell (2004) offers a possible reason for this, stating "…internationalising the curriculum is a construct, not a clearly defined set of ideal or best practices" (p. 2) while Green and Whitsed (2012) posit that "…IoC is the most difficult to define because it couples two fuzzy, ideologically laden terms: "internationalization" and "curriculum" (p. 3).…”
Section: Internationalising the Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internationalised landscapes in fact render the integration of IC necessary. Harrison (2015) and Dervin and Layne (2013) pointed to problems of IaH, such as the home students' unwillingness to establish contact with international students (thus cancelling out any possibility of international transformation on both sides) or university policies that are tacitly excluding students with fewer opportunities and instead aim at more privileged students -who at university entry level already have a good command of English and high intercultural skills. Policy-makers should take these changes into consideration, promoting ESP courses prior to EMI in the curriculum and fostering ESP and EMI collaboration.…”
Section: Marta Aguilarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The access to external curricula, both nationally and internationally, enables the institutions to develop more courses and academic programmes, thereby leading to an increase in enrolment on the specific programmes and their associated courses (Harrison, 2015;Soria & Troisi, 2014) . When HEIs are involved in a socio-cultural partnership in their regional environment, it leads to the creation of new programmes that are directly relevant to the communities within the vicinity of the institution (Lee & Lo, 2016;Zen, 2017).…”
Section: Social Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%