2002
DOI: 10.1002/evan.10038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice random acts of aggression and senseless acts of intimidation: The logic of status contests in social groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this need not be the case. Aggression, for instance, can be used to maintain dominance regardless of the actions taken by the targets of aggression; random acts of aggression can be very effective in maintaining subordination (Silk 2002). The same can be true for all the forms of functional punishment.…”
Section: Punishment (A) Functional Second-party Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this need not be the case. Aggression, for instance, can be used to maintain dominance regardless of the actions taken by the targets of aggression; random acts of aggression can be very effective in maintaining subordination (Silk 2002). The same can be true for all the forms of functional punishment.…”
Section: Punishment (A) Functional Second-party Punishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the logic of animal conflict indicates that while provocation should matter, its effects are likely tempered by the perceived fighting ability of the opponent (Silk, 2002). For this research, this idea can be roughly captured by examining the interaction between size and provocation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although I assigned adolescent-relevant dominance readings by Pellegrini (2002) and Milner (2004) as readings for this class session (along with Silk's, 2002, research on primate aggression), I think it would have been more interesting to assign more anthropological and ethological readings, and include a class discussion focusing on the relative merits of looking across cultures and species when considering behavior. Retaining Silk (2002), I might also add Itani (1961) and/or sections from Bernstein (1981) for a perspective based on research with primates, and provide classic anthropological/sociological perspectives on sources and uses of power from Lippitt, Polansky, Redl, and Rosen (1960) and French and Raven (1959).…”
Section: Status and Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%