2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practice recommendations for the use of sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy

Abstract: ObjectiveAlthough sedation improves patient experience during colonoscopy, there is great jurisdictional variability in sedative practices. The objective of this study was to develop practice recommendations for the use of moderate and deep sedation in routine hospital-based colonoscopy to facilitate standardisation of practice.DesignWe recruited 32 multidisciplinary panellists to participate in a modified Delphi process to establish consensus-based recommendations for the use of sedation in colonoscopy. Panel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved pain relief could, besides improved administration of moderate sedation, include either deeper sedation or better colonoscopy technique, like improved intubation technique (keeping straight scope), use of water-exchange technique and small-calibre, more flexible colonoscopes [48,49]. Though, deep sedation is not recommended for routine colonoscopies according to current consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice [12], propofol is widely used and has been shown to be associated with high patient satisfaction and short recovery [50]. Still, deep sedation has major drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Improved pain relief could, besides improved administration of moderate sedation, include either deeper sedation or better colonoscopy technique, like improved intubation technique (keeping straight scope), use of water-exchange technique and small-calibre, more flexible colonoscopes [48,49]. Though, deep sedation is not recommended for routine colonoscopies according to current consensus-based recommendations for clinical practice [12], propofol is widely used and has been shown to be associated with high patient satisfaction and short recovery [50]. Still, deep sedation has major drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate sedation combining opioids and benzodiazepines is generally recommended [9] while unsedated colonoscopy or sedation on-demand has been recommended in selected patients [10]. Nevertheless, deep propofol sedation is the standard in some parts of the world, while in other parts sedation strategies differ widely [11][12][13]. Most colonoscopies are performed sedation-free in several countries [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the findings of our study will be of particular relevance to jurisdictions facing increasing costs of colonoscopy secondary to increased use of deep sedation. One potential driver of deep sedation use is the small patient satisfaction advantage it confers over moderate sedation 8 —synthesising the evidence and raising awareness around non-pharmacological interventions to improve the patient experience may reduce dependence on deep sedation to optimise the patient experience for routine colonoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 Despite the added cost, deep sedation does not provide significantly improved safety, effectiveness or efficiency for routine colonoscopy. 8 Addressing the appropriate use of deep sedation for routine colonoscopy will require additional research directed at addressing barriers to change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%