2020
DOI: 10.1002/isd2.12165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practices in software testing in Cameroon challenges and perspectives

Abstract: Many software projects in Cameroon and elsewhere fail to produce the desired quality product due to low adoption of good software testing practices, including test automation. The fundamental questions are what are the local barriers to adopting structured approaches to specifying test cases? And what obstacles are preventing software testing from being automated? To answer these questions, this study analyzes software testing practices in Cameroon. The ultimate objective is to issue recommendations on the dir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodologically, instrument was developed to gather empirical data from respondents. This bridges the gap highlighted by Maxime Carlos and Ibrahim (2021) that the barriers to software are not empirically known. Thus, empirical data was gathered, which contributes to the evolution of the theory from software perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methodologically, instrument was developed to gather empirical data from respondents. This bridges the gap highlighted by Maxime Carlos and Ibrahim (2021) that the barriers to software are not empirically known. Thus, empirical data was gathered, which contributes to the evolution of the theory from software perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Also, developers often struggle to detect and fix some challenging errors (Arcuri, 2018). According to Maxime Carlos and Ibrahim (2021), many software lacks the desired quality because of the challenges encountered in software testing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%