Abstract:Reflexivity as a concept and practice is widely recognized and acknowledged in qualitative social science research. In this article, through an account of the ‘reflexive moments’ I encountered during my doctoral research, which employed critical theory perspective and constructivist grounded theory methodology, I elaborate how ethics, methodology and theory construction are intertwined. Further, I dwell on the significance of reflexivity, particularly in qualitative research analysing bioethics concepts. Throu… Show more
“…Place-reflexivity concerns how researchers can "reflect on the location and context and the wider environment" during fieldwork (p. 990). Similar to Subramani (2019), reflexive integration of research elements relies on reflexive moments to activate a deliberate decision-making process to draw inspiration from elements of qualitative or quantitative research into a MMR project.…”
Section: Reflexive Integration Of Research Elements 5mentioning
“…Place-reflexivity concerns how researchers can "reflect on the location and context and the wider environment" during fieldwork (p. 990). Similar to Subramani (2019), reflexive integration of research elements relies on reflexive moments to activate a deliberate decision-making process to draw inspiration from elements of qualitative or quantitative research into a MMR project.…”
Section: Reflexive Integration Of Research Elements 5mentioning
“…One of the difficulties researchers face as they stumble into 'ethically important moments' (Guillemin and Gillam, 2004; see also Subramani, 2019) is that they are often emotionally fraught affairs. While the well-being, safety and protection of research participants is rightly prioritised in professional guidelines, our ability to fulfil these promises remains partly contingent on our own emotional command of the situation.…”
Section: An Affective Account Of the Study's 'Ethics In Practice'mentioning
This article takes Guillemin and Gillam’s distinction between ‘procedural ethics’ and ‘ethics in practice’ as a point of departure and return for reflecting critically on a recently completed doctoral research project about political violence and terrorism. It provides an overview of the study before offering some instructive vignettes to show how ethical decision-making processes engaged with ‘in the field’ were an extension of more everyday and mundane reasoning than we may typically associate with such quintessentially ‘sensitive research’. As the final section of this article argues, it is this everyday and mundane quality to ethical reasoning which is sometimes obscured in formal accounts of ‘reflexivity’. It is hoped that this article is useful for scholars interested in the ethics and emotional practices of qualitative inquiry, as well as those researching serious violence and bereavement.
“…Reflexivity has been advanced as methodological tool and practice to do something in response to "reflexive moments" experienced during research. This has included but is not limited to constructing arguments or making notations in an interview transcript to interpret silence (Morison & Macleod, 2014;Subramani, 2019). Swaminathan and Mulvihill (2019) frame reflexivity as a methodological tool complete with an explicit acronym, VISION, to facilitate what they term "place-reflexivity."…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.