2019
DOI: 10.1177/2059799119863276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Practising reflexivity: Ethics, methodology and theory construction

Abstract: Reflexivity as a concept and practice is widely recognized and acknowledged in qualitative social science research. In this article, through an account of the ‘reflexive moments’ I encountered during my doctoral research, which employed critical theory perspective and constructivist grounded theory methodology, I elaborate how ethics, methodology and theory construction are intertwined. Further, I dwell on the significance of reflexivity, particularly in qualitative research analysing bioethics concepts. Throu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Place-reflexivity concerns how researchers can "reflect on the location and context and the wider environment" during fieldwork (p. 990). Similar to Subramani (2019), reflexive integration of research elements relies on reflexive moments to activate a deliberate decision-making process to draw inspiration from elements of qualitative or quantitative research into a MMR project.…”
Section: Reflexive Integration Of Research Elements 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Place-reflexivity concerns how researchers can "reflect on the location and context and the wider environment" during fieldwork (p. 990). Similar to Subramani (2019), reflexive integration of research elements relies on reflexive moments to activate a deliberate decision-making process to draw inspiration from elements of qualitative or quantitative research into a MMR project.…”
Section: Reflexive Integration Of Research Elements 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the difficulties researchers face as they stumble into 'ethically important moments' (Guillemin and Gillam, 2004; see also Subramani, 2019) is that they are often emotionally fraught affairs. While the well-being, safety and protection of research participants is rightly prioritised in professional guidelines, our ability to fulfil these promises remains partly contingent on our own emotional command of the situation.…”
Section: An Affective Account Of the Study's 'Ethics In Practice'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflexivity has been advanced as methodological tool and practice to do something in response to "reflexive moments" experienced during research. This has included but is not limited to constructing arguments or making notations in an interview transcript to interpret silence (Morison & Macleod, 2014;Subramani, 2019). Swaminathan and Mulvihill (2019) frame reflexivity as a methodological tool complete with an explicit acronym, VISION, to facilitate what they term "place-reflexivity."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%