2014
DOI: 10.5539/elt.v7n2p11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatic Comprehension Development through Telecollaboration

Abstract: Pragmatic comprehension can be ideally developed through contact with target language speakers. This contact can be provided in English as Foreign Language contexts through telecollaboration. To test the actual effect of telecollaboration on the development of pragmatic comprehension, 30 Iranian undergraduates of English as a Foreign Language participated in an experimental study. The participants were divided into two groups of 15 students: control group which merely received pragmatic instructions and experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings obtained in the current study are in line with the findings obtained in the studies conducted by Kinginger and Belz (2005), Vyatkina and Belz (2006), Cunningham and Vyatkina (2012), and Rafieyan et al (2014) who found that telecollaboration has a significant effect in the development of pragmatic competence in language learners. The findings obtained in the current study are also consistent with the findings obtained by Rafieyan et al (2015) who found that telecollaboration has a significantly positive impact on improving target language writing proficiency and maintaining the obtained knowledge to a great extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings obtained in the current study are in line with the findings obtained in the studies conducted by Kinginger and Belz (2005), Vyatkina and Belz (2006), Cunningham and Vyatkina (2012), and Rafieyan et al (2014) who found that telecollaboration has a significant effect in the development of pragmatic competence in language learners. The findings obtained in the current study are also consistent with the findings obtained by Rafieyan et al (2015) who found that telecollaboration has a significantly positive impact on improving target language writing proficiency and maintaining the obtained knowledge to a great extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The study revealed that telecollaborative partnership was effective in the development of pragmatic competence. Rafieyan et al (2014) were the other researchers who investigated the role of telecollaborative partnership in developing language learners' level of pragmatic comprehension. Participants in the study consisted of two groups of undergraduate students of English at a university in Iran: a control group receiving pragmatic instruction and an experimental group being paired with American peers through Facebook alongside receiving pragmatic instruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual exchange projects have been carried out in English language learning (Austin et al, 2017;Rafieyan et al, 2014;Sevilla-Pavón, 2016) and there is a growing body of research on how to integrate virtual exchanges in teacher preparation programs (Lenkaitis, 2020;Dooly & Sadler, 2013;Jauregi & Bañados, 2008;The EVALUATE Group, 2019). In Lenkaitis (2020), participants in a teaching program from a university in the USA were partnered with second language (L2) learners in a 4-week virtual exchange via videoconferencing.…”
Section: Literature Review Virtual Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] explain that the information from different technological media is an input for noticing, comparing and reflection of different cultures including the student`s culture. Ravieyan, et al in [7] explain that technological media enrich information about culture and the students become aware as they notice new elements of culture. Hence, there is improvement of intercultural language competence based on Byram`s model of intercultural communication [2].…”
Section: B Technology In Intercultural Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%