Pragmatic explanations in morphology

Barbaresi, Lavinia Merlini; Dressler, Wolfgang U.

doi:10.1515/9783110440577-011

Cited by 27 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Zatim, u radu ćemo se osvrnuti na veoma često tumačenje značenja deminutiva kroz emocionalne vrednosti, koja su opet zavisna od konteksta, učesnika u komunikaciji, kao i govornih činova (up. Barbaresi & Dressler, 2020;v. odeljak 3).…”

Section: Uvodunclassified

“…infinitivi, participi, množine imenica, u okviru kojih postoji preklapanje karakteristika derivacione i flektivne morfologije (up. Barbaresi & Dressler, 2020) Ipak, najbrojiniji su autori koji građenje deminutiva svrstavaju u okvire derivacione morfologije, među kojima su i brojni autori gramatika srpskog jezika, kao npr. Stanojčić i Popović (2004), Klajn (2005), itd.…”

Section: Deminutiviunclassified

“…Kao što je Nikolova (v. Nicolova, 2013) primetila, baveći se deminucijom u bugarskom jeziku, deminucija u slovenskim jezicima više se tiče derivacione nego flektivne morfologije. Barbarezi i Dresler (Barbaresi & Dressler, 2020) su pokazali da je morfopragmatika prisutnija u tvorbi reči nego u fleksiji. Pretpostavljaju da razlog ovome leži u činjenici da je pragmatika relevantnija na nivou leksike i diskursa.…”

Section: Deminutiviunclassified

“…Dodatno, pokazuju i da se morfopragmatička istraživanja mogu primeniti na francuski sufiks -o koji služi za izražavanje ironije i bliskosti, kao i na sufiks -masu u japanskom jeziku, koji služi za izražavanje društvene i psihološke distance u diskursu (v. Barbaresi & Dressler, 2020). Osim toga, Matielo, Rit-Benmimoun i Dresler (v. Mattiello, Ritt-Benmimoun & Dresler, 2021) bavili su se asimetričnom upotrebom deminutiva u razgovoru sa kućnim ljubimcima.…”

Section: Morfopragmatički Pristupunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Primarna motivisanost upotrebe deminutiva

Oparnica¹

2023

Примењена лингвистика

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sažetak: Тeorijski pristupi analize deminutiva se razlikuju pre svega u odnosu na interpretaciju veze između semantičkih i pragmatičkih značenja. S obzirom na neslaganja oko primarne motivisanosti upotrebe deminutiva, radovi se grubo mogu podeliti na one koji primat daju pragmatici i one koji primat daju semantici. Osim toga, pristupi se razlikuju i u odnosu na svrstavanje deminutiva u okviru derivacione ili flektivne morfologije. Cilj ovog rada jeste prikaz i upoređivanje različitih pristupa analizi deminutiva koje pronalazimo u literaturi. Detaljan teorijski opis lingvističih pojava će nam poslužiti kao važna polazna tačka za studije koje se tiču automatske ekstrakcije deminutiva.

show abstract

Section: Uvodunclassified

Section: Deminutiviunclassified

Section: Morfopragmatički Pristupunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Primarna motivisanost upotrebe deminutiva

Oparnica¹

2023

Примењена лингвистика

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clipping and Truncation

Alber,

Arndt‐Lappe

2023

The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Clipping and truncation are terms referring to non‐concatenative word‐formation processes by which a word (the base) is truncated down to a predictable form (the truncatum) describable with the help of the categories of prosodic structure. The term clipping is usually used for processes where the base is a common noun, adjective, verb or phrase, while truncation is often used irrespective of the syntactic status of the base. A very productive type of truncations are name truncations such as exemplified by the name Patrícia , which can be shortened to the hypocoristic Pat . In phonological theory, truncation processes have encountered much interest because of the templatic shape often realized by the truncatum, most typically a mono‐ or disyllabic foot. Truncation patterns can be classified by the type of template that they realize and by their anchoring properties, in other words by the position of the base preserved in the truncatum, usually its initial or stressed, sometimes its final syllable. In this entry, the most salient properties of truncation patterns are presented, such as the emergence of unmarked structures in the truncatum and phenomena of gradience in anchoring. Recent typological analyses of the phenomenon in the framework of Optimality Theory are discussed, as well as the hesitancy of some morphological theories to recognize truncation processes as part of grammar proper. It is concluded that truncation processes are predictable with respect to the prosodic shape of their outputs and that their meaning can be related to that of other processes of evaluative morphology. However, there is still a certain lack of research when it comes to define the meaning and function of single patterns.

show abstract

Anchoring in truncation: A typological analysis

Alber

Arndt‐Lappe

2022

Nat Lang Linguist Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analyses of truncation patterns (e.g. Rob, from Robert) have traditionally focused on the templatic shape of such forms, while less attention has been paid to the question of which parts of the base word may survive in the truncatum. This feature of truncation, usually referred to as ‘anchoring,’ is investigated in the present paper. On the empirical basis of the generalizations emerging from an extensive database of truncation patterns in the world’s languages, a formal typology of anchoring in the framework of Optimality Theory is constructed and its defining ranking conditions (its ‘typological properties’) are extracted. The typological properties reveal the grammatical forces shaping the various classes of truncation patterns. They show that anchoring constraints must indeed form an integral part of any model of morphological truncation since—in interaction with templatic size-restrictor constraints—they determine whether truncation occurs at all and whether output forms vary in size or are of a fixed templatic shape. A thorough analysis of anchoring thus also provides evidence for templatic shapes emerging from constraint interaction and against an approach in terms of fixed, language-specific templates.

show abstract

Pragmatic explanations in morphology

Cited by 27 publications

References 41 publications

Primarna motivisanost upotrebe deminutiva

Primarna motivisanost upotrebe deminutiva

Clipping and Truncation

Anchoring in truncation: A typological analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About