The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics 2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139764377.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pragmatics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The five forms of speech that show this function can be summarized as follows: (1) Assertive, it is the form of speech that binds the speaker to the truth of the proposition expressed, indicated by stating, suggesting, boasting, complaining, and claim, (2) Directive, which is the form of speech that is intended to make an influence so that the speech partner acts, for examples: ordering, commanding, requesting, advising, and recommending. (3) Expressive, it is a form of speech that serves to express or show the psychological attitude of the speaker to a situation, for example: thanking, congratulating, pardoning, blaming, praising, and condoling, (4) Commissive, it is a form of speech that serves to declare promises or offers, for example: promising, vowing, and offering (5) declaration , it is the form of speech that connects the contents of the speech with reality, for examples: resigning, dismissing, chistening, naming, appointing, excommicating, and sentencing.…”
Section: Perspective Of Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The five forms of speech that show this function can be summarized as follows: (1) Assertive, it is the form of speech that binds the speaker to the truth of the proposition expressed, indicated by stating, suggesting, boasting, complaining, and claim, (2) Directive, which is the form of speech that is intended to make an influence so that the speech partner acts, for examples: ordering, commanding, requesting, advising, and recommending. (3) Expressive, it is a form of speech that serves to express or show the psychological attitude of the speaker to a situation, for example: thanking, congratulating, pardoning, blaming, praising, and condoling, (4) Commissive, it is a form of speech that serves to declare promises or offers, for example: promising, vowing, and offering (5) declaration , it is the form of speech that connects the contents of the speech with reality, for examples: resigning, dismissing, chistening, naming, appointing, excommicating, and sentencing.…”
Section: Perspective Of Teachermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The creation of good two-way communication between the communicator (as a speaker) and the communicant (as a speech partner) has the same view of the information content of messages conveyed through the communication media. In order to make the communication to work well [5], there are many principles of communication that need to be obeyed by speakers and interlocutors. In this era of global communication, people are required to understand the contexts which are deliberately created by speakers, so that some of the goals of communication lead to erroneous transactions [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, corpus linguistics traditionally tends to concentrate on "forms (e.g., text and co-text) at the expense of the (situational, sociological and cultural) dynamics of context, particularly at the local, micro level" (Archer et al 2008, p. 614). To date, an increasing number of studies have merged corpus linguistics and pragmatics, with a particular focus on pragmatic theories including speech acts and pragmatic features such as discourse markers (e.g., Aijmer and Rühlemann 2015;Archer et al 2008;Belz and Vyatkina 2008;Clancy and O'Keeffe 2015;Gisle 2011;Rühlemann 2010Rühlemann , 2011Romero-Trillo 2008, 2016. This merged field is called corpus pragmatics (see Romero-Trillo 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning and purpose of the language construction from symbols can be traced semantically and pragmatically [2]. The lingual markers that appear on the inscriptions, combining them with an understanding of the context of the inscription, and relating it with the history of inscriptions will ease the readers to understand the intent of the inscription text [3]. Therefore, as a form of experimental method to understand the purpose of the inscription text, the researcher tried to synchronize with the inscription of the Tarumanegara kingdom in West Java.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%