Pragmatist philosophy and soft systems in an upland Thai catchment

Abstract

This paper reflects upon an application of soft systems methodology in an upland catchment situation in Thailand in terms of the philosophical underpinnings of approaches to action research. It is argued that a pragmatist philosophy may be more appropriate than the popular emancipatory ethic of critical systems.In the Thai context, patron±client relationships have a fundamental impact on processes of participatory inquiry, and the identification and implementation of collaborative solutions. An adaptation of soft systems methodology has been used to identify mutually beneficial improvements in management between villager, agency and commercial stakeholders. In the Thai situation, it is doubtful to what degree the less powerful village stakeholders wish to`emancipate' themselves out of the institutional protocols of patron± client relationships, as against building further patronage relationships with multiple agency and commercial patrons. Rather than seeking a normative compass through emancipation' as a universal ethic, perhaps we should look to the creative potential within ourselves, and within our cultures.Recent approaches to rural development have moved towards an explicit recognition of power relationships and cultural constraints within which participative processes can occur, and the widely differing values that may be held by different actors. Power relations have also been recognized to have a`generative dimension', whereby we seek to increase the sum total

Ethics and power in community-campus partnerships for research

“…The literature offers multiple examples of the ethical challenges involved in conducting action research (Attwater, 1999;DePoy & Hartman, 1999;Lincoln, 2001;Morton, 1999;Williamson, 2002;Williamson & Prossner, 2002). One set of problems arises in trying to adapt the ethical assurance procedures of conventional research to an action research approach.…”

“…Concurrent with this, strong arguments have been made for why external values, even the emancipatory values espoused by many action researchers, should not supersede those of the local context (Attwater, 1999).…”

The Use of Soft Systems Methodology to Enhance Group Creativity

“…Soft Systems Methodology's allows for the suggestion of new ideas and changing perceptions (Attwater 1999); enables individuals to be more open to new ideas (Clarke 2000); and when a process is consciously structured by the use of SSM, it is ''more capable of generating insights and producing commitments'' (Checkland 2000b:823).…”