Praktik Beracara Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Sumatera Barat Berdasarkan Asas Bajanjang Naiak Batanggo Turun

Abstract

Dengan adanya kebijakan penghapusan peradilan adat maka secara yuridis yang diakui dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia yaitu peradilan negara. Namun di Sumatera Barat eksistensi lembaga penyelesaian sengketa adat ini masih berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Berdasarkan hal tersebut tulisan ini akan mengkaji mengenai praktik penyelesaian sengketa adat di Sumatera Barat. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode pendekatan sosiologis yuridis, mengkaji kaidah, konsep, pandangan masyarakat, doktrin-doktrin hukum. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa tahapan beracara penyelesaian sengketa secara adat dilakukan dengan asas bajanjang naiak batanggo turun yaitu melalui tahap Bakaum (musyawarah antara kaum), Bakampuang (penyelesaian di setiap kampung), kemudian tahap Pasukuan (penyelesaian dibantu oleh suku lain) dan Babalai Bamusajik. Apabila tidak selesai maka diajukan kepada Lembaga Kerapatan Nagari.

Integration Between Customary Law and National Law: An Effort to Build a Pancasila Prismatic Law State

“…5 Furthermore, research conducted by Rikardo Simarmata (2021) focuses on aspects, namely future ideas, on how customary justice and national justice are integrated, especially in practice in court. 6 Further research on the relationship between customary law and national law was carried out by Hazar Kusmayanti, Dede Kania, and Galuh Puspaningrum (2022) regarding the orientation so that customary law principles obtain legal status in legal practice in the national justice system. 7 Of the three previous studies, the research conducted by the author is original because studies on the integration between customary law and national law concerning the ratification of the RKUHP have never been comprehensively studied.…”

“…6 Further research on the relationship between customary law and national law was carried out by Hazar Kusmayanti, Dede Kania, and Galuh Puspaningrum (2022) regarding the orientation so that customary law principles obtain legal status in legal practice in the national justice system. 7 Of the three previous studies, the research conducted by the author is original because studies on the integration between customary law and national law concerning the ratification of the RKUHP have never been comprehensively studied. This research seeks to answer two problem formulations, namely: (1) How is the integration of customary law and national law in the Pancasila law state?, and (2) How are efforts to organize harmonious relations between customary law and national law in the perspective of the prismatic Pancasila state law, especially after the ratification of the RKUHP?.…”