A Voyage Through Turbulence 2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139018241.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prandtl and the Göttingen school

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…An unsteady structure of the wake appears at higher Re, and was reported by Fornberg (1988) among others [8,9]. The drag coefficient C D of a sphere, which varies with the roughness of the sphere surface and Re, was studied in detail, for example, by Eichhorn and Small (1964) and others experimentally [10][11][12][13] and by Tabata and Itakura (1998) [14], Birouk and Al-Sood(2007) [15] numerically. At present, how the drag, lift and pressure coefficients vary both locally as well as globally with respect to the sphere is well known [4,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…An unsteady structure of the wake appears at higher Re, and was reported by Fornberg (1988) among others [8,9]. The drag coefficient C D of a sphere, which varies with the roughness of the sphere surface and Re, was studied in detail, for example, by Eichhorn and Small (1964) and others experimentally [10][11][12][13] and by Tabata and Itakura (1998) [14], Birouk and Al-Sood(2007) [15] numerically. At present, how the drag, lift and pressure coefficients vary both locally as well as globally with respect to the sphere is well known [4,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A central device for the good results obtained is a power law for the wind profile of the type u¯(z)=u*mC0true(zz0true)m, with C0=14/11, m=1/8, for the mean wind speed at height z as a function of u* and the roughness length z 0 for momentum. Such power laws were at the heart of the early theories by L. Prandtl on turbulent boundary layers [ Bodenschatz and Eckert , ]; they were later largely replaced by the log law, but their analytical tractability was one of the reasons that Prandtl let the opportunity of claiming the log law pass to von Kármán (see reference above); the same tractability—and not any deeper physical reason—is the main reason for its adoption in a number of papers by Brutsaert and his collaborators. It is of interest, however, to note that the issue is not settled in favor of the log law.…”
Section: The Seminal Years: Results From the Semi‐empirical Or K Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the active grid was designed for use in the VDTT described in Sec. 2.1, the results presented in this paper were acquired with the grid mounted in an openreturn wind tunnel built in 1935 at the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für Strömungsforschung in Göttingen run by L. Prandtl and H. Reichardt (Reichardt, 1938;Bodenschatz and Eckert, 2011). The original test section of this tunnel was replaced with the present test section, which has the same cross-sectional profile as the VDTT test section.…”
Section: Wind-tunnel Setup and Inflow Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%