2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-analytical and analytical factors influencing Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarker variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ranges of the biomarkers were very different from the ones available from the literature on optimal cut-offs for AD biomarkers [37]. This is mostly due to the heterogeneity of the population, different for sex, age and diagnosis at admission (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The ranges of the biomarkers were very different from the ones available from the literature on optimal cut-offs for AD biomarkers [37]. This is mostly due to the heterogeneity of the population, different for sex, age and diagnosis at admission (Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Surprisingly, although huge efforts have been carried out in the study of preanalytical and analytical conditions affecting biomarker outcomes [28][29][30][31] and consensus guidelines have been reported [12,32], just a few studies have reported the performance of a given set of samples in different laboratories, particularly in the case of aSyn [25,[33][34][35][36]. Furthermore, among these studies, some of them are limited by using low numbers of cases, whereas others did not study the performance of the assays on their diagnostic context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…different CSF collection and processing procedures, repeated freeze-thaw cycles, prolonged or inaccurate storage of samples) and has been shown for other CSF analytes (for review, see ref. 55). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%