2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2010.486806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-classification and post-classification change-detection techniques to monitor land-cover and land-use change using multi-temporal Landsat imagery: a case study on Pisa Province in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, direct use of multi-temporal spectral responses may not lead to satisfactory change detection results, since change detection based on spectral response or textures is sensitive to factors such as different atmospheric conditions, soil moisture conditions, sun elevation angle and plant phenology [37]. In order to avoid these impacts, we used the post-classification method by conducting image classification for each date of imagery separately before conducting change detection, like many previous land-use change studies [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Urban Land Cover Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, direct use of multi-temporal spectral responses may not lead to satisfactory change detection results, since change detection based on spectral response or textures is sensitive to factors such as different atmospheric conditions, soil moisture conditions, sun elevation angle and plant phenology [37]. In order to avoid these impacts, we used the post-classification method by conducting image classification for each date of imagery separately before conducting change detection, like many previous land-use change studies [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Urban Land Cover Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest increases of runoff were found when converting forest and savanna to agriculture, whereas the largest decrease of runoff resulted from a conversion to forest in this study. Further Indian studies focus on the impact of land use change on groundwater (e.g., Khan et al, 2011;Ramesh, 2001;Singh, 2001).…”
Section: P D Wagner Et Al: Impacts Of Land Use Changes On Water Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many applications are focusing on LULC change and urban growth employed PCCD method to identify specific categories of LULC. Thus to explore the change pattern and change effect on surrounding environment (Abd El-Kawy et al 2011;Yuan et al 2005;Sundarakumar et al 2012;Peiman 2011) has been stressed.…”
Section: Change Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed that the most rapid growth happened during 1986-1992. According to previous studies, most of the urban area change detection analyses were conducted based on bi-temporal scheme (Afify 2011) or coarsely multitemporal scheme (Abd El-Kawy et al 2011;Yuan et al 2005;Sundarakumar et al 2012;Peiman 2011;Tian et al 2011;Zha et al 2003;Zhao et al 2005). With easy accessibility of data availability recently, more and more studies used multi-temporal datasets to detect change dynamics of urban area.…”
Section: Change Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%