Pre Clinical- Basic Sciences Teaching Curriculum of a Medical School in a Developing Country -Are We Doing it Right?

Abstract

Background: Preclinical teaching of basic sciences provides the basis for the development of clinical reasoning skills and the ability to make management decisions. However, many senior undergraduates, pre-interns and doctors indicate that basic sciences knowledge is poorly recalled and has little relevance to their clinical practice. Objectives: To explore the perceptions of medical students in their clinical years, and pre-interns about the basic sciences courses taught to them in the preclinical years, and to assess how each group rates the applicability of these courses to current clinical training. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 118 pre-interns and 146 undergraduate medical students using a self-administered questionnaire, regarding their perceptions on preclinical basic sciences teaching. For statistical analysis chi square test was applied. Results: More than 75% both pre-interns and undergraduates agreed that preclinical teaching was useful and relevant for future clinical work. 50-75% frequently revisited preclinical subjects despite unapparent clinical significance. 55% couldn’t remember most of preclinical content. Physiology was the most retained (76%) and most clinically relevant subject (80%). Majority of (>60%) both the groups suggested more teaching time and >75% suggested concurrent clinical exposure for preclinical teaching. Undergraduates and preinterns differed in that 56% of undergraduates and 37% of pre-interns had studied pre clinical subjects just to pass examinations (p<0.01) Conclusions: Majority of undergraduates and pre-interns felt that preclinical teaching is interesting and relevant for future clinical practice, though recall and clinical significance were suboptimal. Revising teaching methods with interdisciplinary integration, early clinical exposure showing relevance of basic sciences and allocating more teaching time utilizing clinicians should be considered. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/jbsp.v9i2.22806 Bangladesh Soc Physiol. 2014, December; 9(2): 98-104

Medical Students’ Perceptions of Pathology and a Proposed Curricular Integration with Histology: A Future Vision of Curricular Change

“…However, more effort is needed to change students' attitudes toward the clinical importance of histology (Moxham et al, 2017). From pathology point of view, many integrated curricula have been tested and used in an attempt to reach maximal students' retention of the pathology knowledge they need in their clinical practice (Haspel et al, 2012;Malau-Aduli et al;Atukorala & Atapattu, 2015;Lisk et al, 2016). However, little is known about the actual difficulties the students face when they try to identify morphologic changes in diseased tissues, and these difficulties need to be systematically addressed.…”

Medical Student’s Perception of Diagnostic Surgical Pathology Course: Necessities, Difficulties and Solutions

“…To modify students' perceptions of the clinical significance of diagnostic pathology, more work may be necessary [14].Numerous integrated curricula have been tried and tested from a pathology perspective in an effort to maximize students' memory of the pathology knowledge they require in their clinical practice [15][16][17][18].However, little is known about the actual challenges the students encounter while attempting to spot morphologic changes in pathological tissues, and these challenges require a methodical approach.…”

Undergraduate Students’ Perception on Assessment Experience in a Malaysian Medical School: Comparison among Gender, Ethnicity and Phase of Study

“…As the curriculum is integrated, clinical exposure needs to be concurrently introduced in the preclinical teaching. 28 Early clinical exposure could familiarise them with the role of basic sciences knowledge in medicine and how to apply the knowledge in clinical settings in the future. 29 The students also gave feedback on the timeliness of the assessment.…”