2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aada72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-ejection period, the reason why the electrocardiogram Q-wave is an unreliable indicator of pulse wave initialization

Abstract: The overall analysis shows PAT is an unreliable measure of PTT and a poor surrogate under clinical interventions common in a critical care setting, due to intra- and inter- subject variability in PEP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, in practice, the R-peak location in ECG signal is often used as a surrogate to aortic valve opening due to simpler measurement. However, using PATs gives only mediocre accuracy compared to PTT due to the physiological variations in PEP [7,8]. Our finding are similar, see for example, Fig.…”
Section: Predictions Of Apwvsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, in practice, the R-peak location in ECG signal is often used as a surrogate to aortic valve opening due to simpler measurement. However, using PATs gives only mediocre accuracy compared to PTT due to the physiological variations in PEP [7,8]. Our finding are similar, see for example, Fig.…”
Section: Predictions Of Apwvsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…To overcome this difficulty, PTT is often approximated using pulse arrival time (PAT) which uses the R-wave of electrocardiogram (ECG) as a reference timing [6]. However, there exists controversy in the clinical accuracy of using PAT in the predictions due to variations in pre-ejection period (PEP) from the R-wave to aortic valve opening [7,8]. An alternative approach is to approximate the reference with a measurement from another distal site near aorta.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the time is measured relative to the ECG QRS complex then it is generally used to define the term pulse arrival time (PAT), an interchangeably measure of PTT. Despite that, both timings could implicate poor correlation due to the variability of the pre-ejection period (PEP), which is from the related ECG QRS complex to the aortic valve opening [ 17 ]. This article follows the usage in previous literature [ 3 , 6 , 16 ], and the term PTT is also adopted to avoid confusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such case, the time difference is referred to as pulse arrival time (PAT). Clinical accuracy is, however, questionable due to physiological variations in pre‐ejection period (from the R‐wave to aortic valve opening) . PTT and PAT have also been suggested to be used for the cuff‐less blood pressure monitoring (see, for example, previous studies), even though clinical reliability of such measurement is also questionable …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical accuracy is, however, questionable due to physiological variations in pre-ejection period (from the R-wave to aortic valve opening). 8,9 PTT and PAT have also been suggested to be used for the cuff-less blood pressure monitoring (see, for example, previous studies 7, 10,11 ), even though clinical reliability of such measurement is also questionable. 12 There are also many studies suggesting to use machine learning (ML) for predicting factors related to cardiac health.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%