2016
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008881.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-employment examinations for preventing injury, disease and sick leave in workers

Abstract: Analysis 4.1. Comparison 4 Fitness training for unfit applicants versus fit applicants, Outcome 1 Risk of Injury (men). Analysis 4.2. Comparison 4 Fitness training for unfit applicants versus fit applicants, Outcome 2 Risk of injury (women). Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Work accommodations versus no need for work accommodations, Outcome 1 Musculoskeletal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The targeted HCU may work as triggers for interventions to address poor work ability ( 9 , 40 ) while they can also work as interventions themselves ( 8 ). The health education given during HCU may have some effect in the prevention of occupational asthma and accidents ( 41 ). Moreover, health education may be even more important from the point of view that the risk factors found during HCU have predictive value of mortality for decades ( 20 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The targeted HCU may work as triggers for interventions to address poor work ability ( 9 , 40 ) while they can also work as interventions themselves ( 8 ). The health education given during HCU may have some effect in the prevention of occupational asthma and accidents ( 41 ). Moreover, health education may be even more important from the point of view that the risk factors found during HCU have predictive value of mortality for decades ( 20 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators of experimental design studies and systematic reviews involving meta-analysis of quantified results from primary studies (e.g., Cochrane Collaboration, the Community Guide) are often limited in their interpretation of results and in the use of research findings for directing policy development and implementation (17). Indeed, a scan through the author conclusions of Cochrane Public Health reviews published between January 2016 and February 2018 revealed that out of 15 reviews published and active during that period, 12 were inconclusive, citing either a lack of clarity in the evidence base (36,48,52), uninterpretability of results (4,30,33), or the need for better quality research to determine conclusions (7-9, 48, 55, 59). A realist critique of the Cochrane approach to reviewing complex social programs in public health is that data aggregation based on counterfactual logic from experimental trials does not typically account for the complexity inherent in socially contingent public health programming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further contribute to reduce absenteeism and work accidents, as well to epidemiological studies of and impacts on the quality of life of workers 49 , 50 . However, in a systematic review performed in 2016 Schaafsma et al 51 failed to find evidence for the effectiveness of this approach for any health condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%