2019
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.73447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-emptive screening for peanut allergy before peanut ingestion in infants is not standard of care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many decisions that are made-such as intradermal testing for delayed amoxicillin exanthems, preemptive screening before food introduction, and administering maintenance immunotherapy in the office in select circumstances-that have been shown to be largely unnecessary from a safety standpoint, not cost-effective, and even potentially harmful in some situations. [49][50][51][52][53] Opportunities. This unprecedented time allows us to reopen the conversation that "evidence is derived from groups, whereas medicine is applied to individuals."…”
Section: Communicating Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many decisions that are made-such as intradermal testing for delayed amoxicillin exanthems, preemptive screening before food introduction, and administering maintenance immunotherapy in the office in select circumstances-that have been shown to be largely unnecessary from a safety standpoint, not cost-effective, and even potentially harmful in some situations. [49][50][51][52][53] Opportunities. This unprecedented time allows us to reopen the conversation that "evidence is derived from groups, whereas medicine is applied to individuals."…”
Section: Communicating Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 However, allergy screening tests are poorly specific, do not alter the natural history of food allergy, are not cost-effective, and can result in overdiagnosis of peanut allergy. 13,14 An Australian study estimated that preemptive screening of infants considered at high risk for peanut allergy would result in screening 16% of the infant population and still miss 23% of peanut allergy cases. 15 The current pandemic may further the narrative already being established in favor of a less medicalized, at-home food introduction, instead of potentially unnecessary preemptive screening.…”
Section: Safementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research supports stronger recommendations than previously, for the active introduction of allergenic foods early in life. Further, there is now compelling evidence that warrants changing other, related recommendations, including the definition of an infant at high risk for developing allergic conditions [ 3 , 8 ], the role of pre-emptive screening [ 8 12 ], the role of hydrolyzed formula [ 13 , 14 ]] for allergy prevention, and the preventive role of breastfeeding in balance with the early introduction of solid foods [ 15 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%