2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.06.23288271
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-existing left bundle branch block and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract: Background There are currently few reports on pre-existing left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Nor are there any studies comparing patients with new onset LBBB to those with pre-existing LBBB. This study aimed to investigate the association with pre-existing or new-onset LBBB and clinical outcomes after TAVR. Methods Using data from the Japanese multicenter registry, 5996 patients who underwent TAVR between October 2013 and December 2019 were in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fischer et al reported that prior LBBB was associated with early PPI after TAVR, 30 whereas Saito et al recently reported that there was no association between prior LBBB and PPI. 31 The association between new‐onset LBBB and PPI after TAVR also remains controversial. 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 Urena et al demonstrated that new‐onset LBBB is associated with the incidence of PPI, 12 whereas Schymik et al demonstrated absence of any association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischer et al reported that prior LBBB was associated with early PPI after TAVR, 30 whereas Saito et al recently reported that there was no association between prior LBBB and PPI. 31 The association between new‐onset LBBB and PPI after TAVR also remains controversial. 7 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 Urena et al demonstrated that new‐onset LBBB is associated with the incidence of PPI, 12 whereas Schymik et al demonstrated absence of any association.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%