2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2022.105505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-landslide topographic reconstruction in Baetis Chaos, mars using a CaSSIS Digital Elevation Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that a CTX‐based DEM provides a significant increase in accuracy in Martian topographic analysis relative to MOLA and High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) DEMs. However, the most detailed topographic information can be obtained from the HiRISE DEMs (ground sampling distances and vertical resolution of <1 m; Brož et al., 2015; Guimpier et al., 2022), but the Mars surface coverage of these data is low. The HiRISE imagery has currently covered ∼0.5% of the surface of Mars with unique stereo‐pair coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed that a CTX‐based DEM provides a significant increase in accuracy in Martian topographic analysis relative to MOLA and High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) DEMs. However, the most detailed topographic information can be obtained from the HiRISE DEMs (ground sampling distances and vertical resolution of <1 m; Brož et al., 2015; Guimpier et al., 2022), but the Mars surface coverage of these data is low. The HiRISE imagery has currently covered ∼0.5% of the surface of Mars with unique stereo‐pair coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the only known rampart geometries on Mars have been provided by Wilson et al (2009), who determined the mean thickness of the vent-proximal deposits using MOLA-based topographical profiles. Although the vertical resolutions of both MOLA and CTX-based DEMs are comparable (1-2 m; Guimpier et al, 2022;Mouginis-Mark et al, 2018), the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) spatial sampling is almost ∼30 times coarser. Therefore, the results obtained by Wilson et al (2009) are less precise than what can now be achieved with CTX data.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Planetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brunetti et al, 2014;Legros, 2002;Lucchitta, 1978Lucchitta, , 1979McEwen, 1989). However, the avail- ability of higher-resolution orbital imagery has shown the existence of Martian long-runout landslides that are smaller and similar in size to terrestrial long-runout landslides (Crosta et al, 2018;Guimpier et al, 2021Guimpier et al, , 2022.…”
Section: Morphometric Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistics of the morphometry of small martian landslides is summarised in Figure 12 and The gigantic, long runout landslides on Mars have attracted much interest, giving rise to a common commonly accepted belief that martian landslides are an order of magnitude larger than terrestrial landslides (e.g., Brunetti et al, 2014;Legros, 2002;Lucchitta, 1978Lucchitta, , 1979McEwen, 1989). However, the availability of higher resolution orbital imagery has shown the 230 existence of martian long runout landslides that are smaller and similar in size to terrestrial long runout landslides (Crosta et al, 2018;Guimpier et al, 2021Guimpier et al, , 2022. Not only they share morphometric similarities, but also morphological structures: in addition to longitudinal ridges, they are all characterised by steep terminal edges; additionally, both the Icelandic and martian populations can develop lateral levees or toreva blocks, and have their headscarps either at the top of cliffs or at a mid-to-lower part of slopes.…”
Section: Martian Long Runout Landslides With Longitudinal Ridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%