1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00118-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri — correlation with bimanual examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover Flickinger et al found greater errors in estimates of the uterine size when using bimanual examination than by ultrasonography, when compared with the actual uterine volume after hysterectomy [17]. But the study populations were small and not all included patients were diagnosed with uterine fibroids, unlike our study [16,17]. In contrast, a large study by Harb et al found only bimanual estimation to be an accurate method, and questions the use of routine ultrasound to confirm the uterine size before hysterectomy [18].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover Flickinger et al found greater errors in estimates of the uterine size when using bimanual examination than by ultrasonography, when compared with the actual uterine volume after hysterectomy [17]. But the study populations were small and not all included patients were diagnosed with uterine fibroids, unlike our study [16,17]. In contrast, a large study by Harb et al found only bimanual estimation to be an accurate method, and questions the use of routine ultrasound to confirm the uterine size before hysterectomy [18].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Three studies showed that ultrasonographic dimensions significantly correlate with the true dimensions of the removed uteri as described in histopathology reports [16,17,21]. Moreover Flickinger et al found greater errors in estimates of the uterine size when using bimanual examination than by ultrasonography, when compared with the actual uterine volume after hysterectomy [17].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dekel et al (1998) have demonstrated the accuracy of preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the uterus. In their study, the uterine size of 49 consecutive patients who underwent elective hysterectomy was assessed by bimanual examination, preoperative ultrasound and actual postoperative size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Our study found that preoperative uterine measurements that most accurately predict the need to morcellate at the time of TLH are bimanual exam, uterine cross-sectional area, and size of the largest leiomyoma. Prior studies on this subject have used uterine pathologic weight to determine cut-offs as to which specimens will require morcellation and then have relied on conversion equations to translate uterine weight to estimated preoperative uterine volume [23][24][25][26]. This is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate all uterine measurements that may be available preoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%