2016
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.994109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-oxidation effect on ammoxidation of activated carbon and its influence on Cu(II) adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the data presented in Table 6, the maximum adsorption capacities obtained for the samples studied in this work (especially N-doped activated carbon) are comparable to or higher than the literature values for many adsorbents obtained from different precursors. For example, the adsorption capacity towards copper(II) ions exceeds the results obtained for activated carbons modified by tannic acid [36], sodium diethyl dithiocarbamate immobilization [37], or non-thermal plasma [38], although they were much lower than the results obtained for pre-oxidized and ammoxidized commercial activated carbon (optimum adsorption capacity ~250 mg/g) [39] or carbonaceous nanofibers [40] and crosslinked chitosan [41]. Similar results were obtained for zinc(II) ions.…”
Section: Sorption Isotherms Studiessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…According to the data presented in Table 6, the maximum adsorption capacities obtained for the samples studied in this work (especially N-doped activated carbon) are comparable to or higher than the literature values for many adsorbents obtained from different precursors. For example, the adsorption capacity towards copper(II) ions exceeds the results obtained for activated carbons modified by tannic acid [36], sodium diethyl dithiocarbamate immobilization [37], or non-thermal plasma [38], although they were much lower than the results obtained for pre-oxidized and ammoxidized commercial activated carbon (optimum adsorption capacity ~250 mg/g) [39] or carbonaceous nanofibers [40] and crosslinked chitosan [41]. Similar results were obtained for zinc(II) ions.…”
Section: Sorption Isotherms Studiessupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A concurrent process of oxidation and nitriding takes place during ammoxidation, resulting in substantial alterations to the material's chemical structure. The ammoxidation process serves as a means to incorporate considerable nitrogen content into the carbon structure, resulting in a material characterised by a more well-developed total surface area and increased microporosity compared to nitrogen-unmodified coals [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these methods, adsorption seems to be a superior technique to remove heavy metal ions because it was cost‐effective and convenient to design . Many adsorbents, like modified silica, activated carbon, inorganic materials, and biomass, have been studied for copper ions removal. Biosorbents have been proved to be one of the effective adsorbents for removing copper ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%