2018
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2018.03.0153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre‐Plant and In‐Season Nitrogen Combinations for the Northern Corn Belt

Abstract: S pring pre-plant N applications are considered a bestmanagement practice in conventionally tilled, poorly drained, medium-to fine-textured soils throughout the northern Corn Belt (Vetsch and Randall, 2004). Corn (Zea mays L.) yield potential is affected by a multitude of agronomic practices (e.g., fertility management), cultivars, and the environment (Evans and Fischer, 1999). Recent data project more frequent heat waves (i.e., >5°C above climatic normal) and increasing air temperatures (1.5-2.0°C) over the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, N mobility and availability from preplanting incorporation (PPI) may be limited under dry soil conditions and reduce early‐season growth relative to starter fertilizer placed 2 inches below and 2 inches to the side of the seed (the 2 × 2 treatment) (i.e. subsurface N placement) (Chaidhary & Prihar, 1974; Khosla, Alley, & Davis, 2000; Rutan & Steinke, 2018). In Michigan, Rutan and Steinke (2018) reported that PPI application reduced yield relative to subsurface N placement when deficit cumulative April to June rainfall occurred but resulted in similar yields when cumulative May to June precipitation was above normal.…”
Section: Using Nitrogen Timing and Placement To Improve Corn Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, N mobility and availability from preplanting incorporation (PPI) may be limited under dry soil conditions and reduce early‐season growth relative to starter fertilizer placed 2 inches below and 2 inches to the side of the seed (the 2 × 2 treatment) (i.e. subsurface N placement) (Chaidhary & Prihar, 1974; Khosla, Alley, & Davis, 2000; Rutan & Steinke, 2018). In Michigan, Rutan and Steinke (2018) reported that PPI application reduced yield relative to subsurface N placement when deficit cumulative April to June rainfall occurred but resulted in similar yields when cumulative May to June precipitation was above normal.…”
Section: Using Nitrogen Timing and Placement To Improve Corn Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefits to increased plant size may include greater photosynthetic capacity and a larger root system able to support or initiate BNF and soil nutrient uptake earlier, but yield‐limiting factors including plant lodging and disease severity (e.g., white mold [ Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ]) must be accounted for (Ball et al., 2000; Salvagiotti et al., 2008; De Souza Jaccoud‐Filho et al., 2016; Tamagno et al., 2018). Subsurface banded fertilizer applications have previously been observed to increase early‐season DM and nutrient accumulation in corn ( Zea mays L.) (Niehues, Lamond, Godsey, & Olsen, 2004; Rutan & Steinke, 2018). As soybean growers respond to a changing climate and plant earlier in the season due to warmer air and soil temperatures, similar benefits may exist in soybean production (Hankinson et al., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quadratic model describing yield and net return response to seeding rate was fit to the data and suggested maximum grain yield was achieved at 364,300 seeds ha −1 while net economic return was maximized at 265,300 seeds ha −1 . Growers often identify grain yield potential as a greater risk factor instead of profitability (Rutan & Steinke, 2018). Without improvements to commodity prices, results from this study suggest growers may want to consider incrementally decreasing seeding rates to <321,200 seed ha −1 for increased profitability instead of maximizing yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When following radish, PL maintained corn yield potential with full SD delayed until V11 as compared with the current 2×2 starter N rate. Characteristics of PL including increased at‐plant N rate or slower availability likely helped increase N supply until the V11 SD timing (Rutan and Steinke, 2018). Growers who prefer to utilize an oat CC may have to consider N placement in relation to residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%