1998
DOI: 10.1017/s0016756897008285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Priabonian Palaeogene formations in southwestern Bulgaria and northern Greece: stratigraphy and tectonic implications

Abstract: The Paril Formation (South Pirin and Slavyanka Mountains, southwestern Bulgaria) and the Prodromos Formation (Orvilos and Menikion Mountains, northern Greece) consist of breccia and olistostrome built up predominantly of marble fragments from the Precambrian Dobrostan Marble Formation (Bulgaria) and its equivalent Bos-Dag Marble Formation (Greece). The breccia and olistostrome are interbedded with thin layers of calcarenites (with occasional marble pebbles), siltstones, sandstones and limes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lips et al, 2000;Liati, 2005) units of continental and oceanic affinities, intruded by Late Cretaceous to Early Miocene granitoids (Meyer, 1968;Del Moro et al, 1988;Dinter et al, 1995;Peytcheva et al, 1999;Marchev et al, 2006). Late Cretaceous-Palaeocene to Miocene-Pliocene sediments (Ivanov and Kopp, 1969;Zagorchev, 1998;Boyanov and Goranov, 2001) and Late Eocene-Oligocene volcanic and volcanosedimentary successions (Innocenti et al, 1984;Harkovska et al, 1989;Yanev and Bardintzeff, 1997) represent Tertiary syn-to posttectonic cover sequences. Earlier interpretations considered the Rhodope Massif as a Precambrian cratonic block, largely unaffected by Alpine deformations (e.g.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lips et al, 2000;Liati, 2005) units of continental and oceanic affinities, intruded by Late Cretaceous to Early Miocene granitoids (Meyer, 1968;Del Moro et al, 1988;Dinter et al, 1995;Peytcheva et al, 1999;Marchev et al, 2006). Late Cretaceous-Palaeocene to Miocene-Pliocene sediments (Ivanov and Kopp, 1969;Zagorchev, 1998;Boyanov and Goranov, 2001) and Late Eocene-Oligocene volcanic and volcanosedimentary successions (Innocenti et al, 1984;Harkovska et al, 1989;Yanev and Bardintzeff, 1997) represent Tertiary syn-to posttectonic cover sequences. Earlier interpretations considered the Rhodope Massif as a Precambrian cratonic block, largely unaffected by Alpine deformations (e.g.…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The massif either formed as a fragment of preAlpine continental crust involved in European margin convergent tectonics during the Mesozoic and Tertiary (e.g., von Braun 1993, Zagorchev 1998, or as part of south-directed growth of crust during the Mesozoic through subduction and accretion within a northdirected Paleotethyan subduction system (Barr et al 1999). The Rhodope Massif experienced two episodes of crustal extension, accompanied by two periods of magmatism (Marchev et al 2004, Marchev 2007: an early Latest Cretaceous -Lower Eocene ductile extension and exhumation of several metamorphic core complexes below low-angle detachments associated with 70-42 Ma granitic plutons, and a subsequent Late Eocene -Miocene brittle extension through high-angle faulting (Dinter & Royden 1993, Sokoutis et al 1993, Krohe & Mposkos 2002, Brun & Sokoutis 2007.…”
Section: Regional Geology Of Northeastern Greecementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uneven distribution of dissected leaves Batrachium throughout Europe can be explained by the existence of other niches in Eastern Europe which are absent in Western Europe or by the occupation of R. trichophyllus of all the niches in Western Europe than other Batrachium species occupy in eastern Europe. The first explanation is supported by the high variety of carbonated lithologies in Eastern Europe (Zagorchev, 1998). The second explanation is supported by the ecological breadth of R. trichophyllus, along with its high colonization ability (Lacoul and Freedman, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%