It is clear that clinicians are expected to use evidence in the clinical care they deliver every day and randomized controlled trials are considered as "gold standard". In most cases, especially in orthodontics, evaluation takes place long after an untested appliance is already in wide use. This approach shows flagrant disregards to the potential harm done to the individuals concerned. The Dynamax example starkly shows how a rigorous trial put a stop to the detrimental treatment. [1] There are a growing number of new appliances used by orthodontists that warrant the urgent need to conduct new trials and to maintain the quality of orthodontic care. In orthodontics, several appliances and techniques are practiced based on poor quality of evidence or on the principle of what works in their hands. According to Clayton, [2] "the doctor has no ethical responsibility to treat a patient in the manner he believes to be the best, if that belief is unsupported by evidence or consensus." If we are to become more evidence-based and not at the