2019
DOI: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Service and in-Service Teachers’ Experiences of Inquiry-Based Primary Science Teaching: A Collaborative Team Teaching Model

Abstract: This research clarifies how a collaborative team teaching model (CTTM) can support both pre-service and in-service teachers’ professional development in using inquiry-based science teaching in primary schools. The data were collected via a questionnaire-based survey approach after inquiry projects implementation at public schools in four Finnish cities. In total, 98 pre-service teachers and 51 in-service class teachers were involved in the research. According to their experiences collaborative team teaching w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, pre-service teachers may be more tech-savvy and open to trying new teaching methods, but they may lack the practical experience and knowledge of classroom management that comes with years of teaching. The collaboration obviously supports initial and improvement of professional development, ideas sharing of new teaching methods, and teacher motivation (Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2019). Collaborative action research assists pre-service teachers to train themselves in terms of reflective abilities in professional development practices when taking part in a learning community filling the gaps left by the absence of some tutors' good examples (Qing-li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, pre-service teachers may be more tech-savvy and open to trying new teaching methods, but they may lack the practical experience and knowledge of classroom management that comes with years of teaching. The collaboration obviously supports initial and improvement of professional development, ideas sharing of new teaching methods, and teacher motivation (Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2019). Collaborative action research assists pre-service teachers to train themselves in terms of reflective abilities in professional development practices when taking part in a learning community filling the gaps left by the absence of some tutors' good examples (Qing-li et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-service teachers have recent knowledge and ideas concerning inquiry-based and integrative learning activities from their university courses (which have followed the recently updated national core curriculum) as well as those provided by the teacher educators during the orientation phase (refer to Figure 1). In-service teachers, in turn, have expertise in everyday school practices, student groups, and suitable pedagogical approaches (Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2019). The teacher educator member of the team facilitates and supports the team with ideas and current knowledge and provides material and resources from the university.…”
Section: The Developed Professional Learning Model For Co-teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study explored the challenges related to co-teaching that arose and how they were coped with during a professional learning project piloted in the Finnish teacher education context (Kervinen et al, 2016;Havu-Nuutinen et al, 2019). In the designed model, pre-service teachers and in-service teachers were encouraged to strive for equal collaboration despite their different backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the implementation of inquiry necessitates the utilization of exploratory scientific procedures and a methodology closely aligned with the ways in which scientists investigate the environment and generate scientific knowledge [25][26][27]. Guided inquiry in the classroom has the potential to enhance students' acquisition of scientific knowledge [28], promote argumentative capacity based on scientific procedures such as observation, discovery, comparison, explanation, discussion, and questioning [29,30], and can be further enriched when combined with other strategies, such as collaborative learning [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%