2019
DOI: 10.15700/saje.v39n1a1550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-service mathematics teachers’ mental constructions when using Cramer’s rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This showed that these students understood the concepts as isolated facts and just memorized some rules which were not connected. This hampered the development of the required schema as mentioned by Ndlovu and Brijlall (2019) that university students only master a collection of algorithms which does not lead to a deeper understanding of the concepts.…”
Section: 𝑐 𝑑mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This showed that these students understood the concepts as isolated facts and just memorized some rules which were not connected. This hampered the development of the required schema as mentioned by Ndlovu and Brijlall (2019) that university students only master a collection of algorithms which does not lead to a deeper understanding of the concepts.…”
Section: 𝑐 𝑑mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This represents a gap in literature which this study sought to fill. However, APOS studies were conducted in students' learning other concepts, for example, the Cramer's rule (Ndlovu & Brijlall, 2019), eigenvectors (Salgado & Trigueros, 2015), derivatives (Maharaj, 2013;Moru, 2020), trigonometric ratios and their inverses (Martínez-Planell & Delgado, 2016), the inverse matrix method (Kazunga & Bansilal, 2020), and others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main issue in this paper is how undergraduate students conceptualise learning of the Binomial series expansion. Students' mental structures are a key determinant of the extent to which they learn specified topics in mathematics (Ndlovu & Brijlall, 2019). I assume that a fully developed schema in a given topic has the potential to assist students to answer any given question in that topic and to apply what they would have learnt to unfamiliar contexts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a teaching method, the theory is used to design activities for the teaching of a mathematical concept and to examine the mental structures of students after the implementation of these activities (Trigueros & Martinez-Planell, 2010). As seen in the related literature, although the APOS Theory is mostly used for data analysis (Bansilal, 2011;Brijlall & Maharaj, 2015;Brijlall & Ndlazi, 2019;Chimhande, Naidoo, & Stols, 2017;Martinez-Planell, Gaisman, & McGee, 2017) and as a teaching method (Martin, Loch, Cooley, Dexter, & Vidakovic, 2010;Possani, Trigueros, Preciado, & Lozano, 2010), it is also possible to find studies in which the APOS Theory was used for both purposes (Figueroa, Possani, & Trigueros, 2018;Maharaj, 2013;Moon, 2019;Ndlovu & Brijlall, 2019;Trigueros & Possani, 2013). In summary, the APOS Theory can be used for data analysis, as a teaching method, or both.…”
Section: The Purpose Of Using the Apos Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%