2018
DOI: 10.29329/epasr.2018.137.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-service Science Teachers' Decisions and Types of Informal Reasoning about the Socioscientific Issue of Nuclear Power Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The code 'alternative energy sources' might encourage participants to re-think our consumption habits. Hence, people could think about evidence and content knowledge (e.g., Flener-Lovitt, 2014;Yapıcıoğlu & Aycan, 2018;Karpudewan & Roth, 2016) by weighing and leveraging dimensions of SSI such as economic, environmental, health, social and ethics (Price et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thematic Codes For the Research Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code 'alternative energy sources' might encourage participants to re-think our consumption habits. Hence, people could think about evidence and content knowledge (e.g., Flener-Lovitt, 2014;Yapıcıoğlu & Aycan, 2018;Karpudewan & Roth, 2016) by weighing and leveraging dimensions of SSI such as economic, environmental, health, social and ethics (Price et al, 2014).…”
Section: Thematic Codes For the Research Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are researchers that take into consideration the related attitude and point of views of the pre-service science teachers (e.g. Ates & Saracoğlu, 2013;Cansız & Cansız, 2015;Ercan, Ural & Tekbıyık, 2015;Eş, Işık Mercan & Ayas, 2016;Evren Yapıcıoğlu & Aycan, 2018;Kapici & Ilhan, 2016;Özdemir & Çobanoğlu, 2008;Özdemir, 2014;Yener, Aksüt & Somuncu Demir, 2017), teachers (Kenar, 2013;Lee & Yang, 2013) and students (Jho et al, 2014;Wu & Tsai, 2007;Yang & Anderson, 2003) towards nuclear power plants. A limited number of research was conducted with teachers (Kenar, 2013;Lee & Yang, 2013).…”
Section: Nuclear Power Plants As a Socio-scientific Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In teaching SSIs, many studies are focused on argumentation (Capkinoglu et al, 2020;Dawson & Carson, 2020;Namdar & Shen, 2016), dilemmas (Rydberg et al, 2017), reasoning (Cian, 2020;Karahan & Roehrig, 2017;Ozturk & Yilmaz -Tuzun, 2017), critical thinking (Gul & Akcay, 2020) and decision making strategies (Altmeyer & Dreesmann, 2021;Dauer et al, 2017;Sutter et al, 2019;Yapıcıoğlu & Aycan, 2018). From these studies, Capkinoglu et al (2020) evaluated the 10-week argumentation process of students in their study of local environmental SSIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their studies, they concluded that the applied model increased the critical thinking tendencies of pre-service teachers. Yapıcıoğlu and Aycan (2018) examined the effects of teaching activities related to nuclear power plants on the decisions, positions and informal reasoning of pre-service teachers. In their study, they concluded that the pre-service teachers had decided that no nuclear power plant should be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%