2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pre-Trial EEG-Based Single-Trial Motor Performance Prediction to Enhance Neuroergonomics for a Hand Force Task

Abstract: We propose a framework for building electrophysiological predictors of single-trial motor performance variations, exemplified for SVIPT, a sequential isometric force control task suitable for hand motor rehabilitation after stroke. Electroencephalogram (EEG) data of 20 subjects with mean age of 53 years was recorded prior to and during 400 trials of SVIPT. They were executed within a single session with the non-dominant left hand, while receiving continuous visual feedback of the produced force trajectories. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 nicely demonstrates C E subject S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 that the majority of clusters clearly exceed these reliability criteria. The decoding accuracies are in a comparable range as in earlier work on performance decoding for SVIPT [26]. 2) Homogeneity of clusters: DBSCAN separates between cluster and outlier samples.…”
Section: B Group-level Validation Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 nicely demonstrates C E subject S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 that the majority of clusters clearly exceed these reliability criteria. The decoding accuracies are in a comparable range as in earlier work on performance decoding for SVIPT [26]. 2) Homogeneity of clusters: DBSCAN separates between cluster and outlier samples.…”
Section: B Group-level Validation Of the Methodssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…As an application scenario, we chose to decode trial-wise reaction time from multi-channel EEG recordings segmented relative to a time interval close to the SVIPT go-cue. A more detailed description can be found in our initial paper [26].…”
Section: B Optimized Spatial Filtering For Single-trial Eeg Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it could be even more interesting to investigate whether novel or so‐far unknown features are used and to characterize them. This could be especially informative for tasks where the discriminative features are less well known than for motor decoding, for example, for less‐investigated tasks such as decoding of task performance [Meinel et al, ]. But even for the data used in this study, our results show hints that deep ConvNets used different features than shallow ConvNets and the FBCSP‐based decoding, as there are statistically significant differences between their confusion matrices (Result 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Taking a closer look into the BCI decoding literature, a variety of methods for oscillatory EEG classification problems can be found, but for the regression case the choice still is extremely limited (Wu et al, 2017) even though regression methods allow tackling highly interesting problems. Examples are the estimation of continuous mental workload levels (Frey et al, 2016;Schultze-Kraft et al, 2016), decoding the depth of cognitive processing (Nicolae et al, 2017), predicting singletrial motor performance (Meinel et al, 2016) or continuous decoding of movement trajectories (Úbeda et al, 2017). A spatial filtering solution, which solves an EEG regression problem, was provided by Dähne et al (2014) with the source power comodulation algorithm (SPoC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%