Preanalytical Nonconformity Management Regarding Primary Tube Mixing in Brazil

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe multifaceted clinical laboratory process is divided in three essential phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical phase. Problems emerging from the preanalytical phase are responsible for more than 60% of laboratory errors. This report is aimed at highlighting and discussing nonconformity (e.g., nonstandardized procedures) in primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture with evacuated tube systems.MethodsFrom January 2015 to December 2015, fifty different laboratory quality managers from Brazil were contacted to request their internal audit reports on nonconformity regarding primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture performed using evacuated tube systems.Results and ConclusionsA minority of internal audits (i.e., 4%) concluded that evacuated blood tubes were not accurately mixed after collection, whereas more than half of them reported that evacuated blood tubes were vigorously mixed immediately after collection, thus magnifying the risk of producing spurious hemolysis. Despite the vast ma jority of centers declaring that evacuated blood tubes were mixed gently and carefully, the overall number of inversions was found to be different from that recommended by the manufacturer. Since the turbulence generated by the standard vacuum pressure inside the primary evacuated tubes seems to be sufficient for providing solubilization, mixing and stabilization between additives and blood during venipuncture, avoidance of primary tube mixing probably does not introduce a major bias in tests results and may not be considered a nonconformity during audits for accreditation.

An Overview of Complete Blood Count Sample Rejection Rates in a Clinical Hematology Laboratory Due to Various Preanalytical Errors

“…Besides that, the sample rejection criteria differ from one laboratory to the next [ 9 ]. There is a lack of professional data on reporting, root cause analysis, and laboratory error prevention strategies [ 10 ]. The aim of this research is to observe the frequency of complete blood count (CBC) sample rejection factors to improve the quality of results and reduce pre-analytical errors.…”

Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratories in Developing Countries: Assessment of Pre-Analytical Errors in a Chemical Pathology Laboratory in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria

“…Laboratory errors are divided into pre-analytical, analytical and post analytical errors (Lima-Oliveira, et al 2017). Most times the analytical and post analytical phases are what pathologists, scientists and accreditation bodies concentrate on.…”

“…This has led to laboratories overlooking the pre-analytical errors and processes when preparing for accreditation. The introduction of pre analytical quality indicators by the international organization for standardization (ISO) has helped laboratories to identify and assess the nonconformities to the processes in relation to specifications described in the standard operation procedures/ literatures (Lima-Oliveira, et al 2017). The ISO quality indicators which are generally accepted as the basis for the assessment of the pre analytical phase of the total testing process has the capacity for modification, based on individual laboratory practice (Da Rin.…”