Preapplication of Orthodontic Forces to the Donor Teeth Affects Periodontal Healing of Transplanted Teeth

Suzaki, Yusuke; Matsumoto, Yoshirô; Kanno, Zuisei; Soma, Kunimichi

doi:10.2319/020207-51.1

Cited by 31 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The patients in the present study were treated on the assumption that root development of two-thirds three-fourths was optimal. Suzaki et al 23 recently proposed that the prognosis for transplantation of teeth in adults might be improved by several months of orthodontic treatment prior to transplantation of teeth that have been in occlusion for some time.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autotransplantation of Teeth in 215 Patients

Kvint¹,

Lindsten²,

Magnusson³

et al. 2010

The Angle Orthodontist

108

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the success rate of autotransplantation of teeth in consecutive patients and to analyze factors affecting the outcome. Materials and Methods: The subjects consisted of 215 consecutive patients (101 women and 114 men; aged 9.1-56.4 years, median age 15.2 years [P 10 5 11.4, P 90 5 19.7]) who had undergone transplantation of a total of 269 teeth, all by the same surgeon. In patients with multiple transplants, only the first transplant was included, to ensure that all transplanted teeth were independent units. The transplants were recorded as unsuccessful if the tooth had been extracted or was surviving but with root resorption or ankylosis. The interval between transplantation and final follow-up was a median 4.8 years (P 10 5 2.0, P 90 5 5.5) for successful transplants and a median of 2.4 years (P 10 5 0.4, P 90 5 7.7) for unsuccessful transplants. Results: One-hundred seventy-five (81%) of the transplantations were recorded as successful and 40 (19%) as unsuccessful. Twenty-five teeth had been extracted and 15 had survived but did not fulfill the criteria for success. Conclusions: The success rate of 215 consecutively transplanted teeth was 81%. The highest success rate was for transplantation of premolars to the maxillary incisor region (100%).Complications at surgery such as difficult extraction, deviant root anatomy, or damaged root periodontium affected the outcome. During growth, a successful transplant preserves alveolar bone. (Angle Orthod. 2010;80:446-451.)

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Autotransplantation of Teeth in 215 Patients

Kvint¹,

Lindsten²,

Magnusson³

et al. 2010

The Angle Orthodontist

108

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Significantly less root resorption was detected in the teeth where an orthodontic force was applied (Suzaki et al . ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Application of light orthodontic forces to the molars of Sprague‐Dawley rats for seven days resulted in a significantly wider area of the PDL compared to that in the contralateral control teeth not subjected to orthodontic forces (Suzaki et al . ). Fourteen days after replantation of the teeth subjected to light orthodontic forces for seven days, the active root‐resorption lacunae were decreased compared to those in the contralateral control teeth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of orthodontic forces prior to autotransplantation – case reports

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Auto transplantation of tooth ensures maintenance of alveolar bone volume by physiological stimulation of the periodontal ligament (PDL). Recently, auto transplantation has begun to gain attention again, most likely because of the research on PDL healing after auto transplantation has provided helpful information that can be applied to the procedure [2,3]. Transplantation has a key role in the replacement of young patients missing teeth [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auto Transplantation of a Mandibular Third Molar with Complete Root Development - A Case Report?

Chopra¹

2017

JDHODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autogenous transplantation is an economical as well as the most sorted option for the treatment of badly destroyed teeth when a suitable donor tooth is available. This paper presents successful auto transplantation of a mature mandibular right third molar (48) without anatomical variance is used to replace a grossly decayed mandibular right first molar (46). The mandibular first molar was nonrestorable due to extensive root caries. After extraction of mandibular first molar, root canal therapy was done for the third molar extraorally, and the tooth was reimplanted into the recipient site. After 1.8 years, clinical and radiographic examination revealed satisfactory outcome with no signs or symptoms suggestive of pathology. In selected cases, autogenous tooth transplantation, even after complete root formation of the donor tooth, may be considered as a practical treatment alternative to conventional prosthetic rehabilitation or implant treatment. IntroductionAuto transplantation of teeth has been done for many years but with varying degrees of success. It is considered as an alternative treatment for a single tooth oral rehabilitation and it is possible that it becomes more frequent if the technique respects the protocol to be followed. Auto transplantation is defined as the transplantation of embedded, impacted or erupted teeth from one site into the extraction sites or surgically prepared sockets in the same person [1]. Auto transplantation of tooth ensures maintenance of alveolar bone volume by physiological stimulation of the periodontal ligament (PDL). Recently, auto transplantation has begun to gain attention again, most likely because of the research on PDL healing after auto transplantation has provided helpful information that can be applied to the procedure [2,3]. Transplantation has a key role in the replacement of young patients missing teeth [4]. Osseointegrated implants are generally contraindicated for young patients with developing alveolar bone because infraocclusion results when the implant fails to form alveolar bone. Since the procedure causes bone and dental implant material to be fused together, the implant does not erupt along with the adjacent teeth, so the placement of dental implants may be avoided in young adolescent patients. Because of this tooth auto transplantation, which maintains the PDL, will continue to be a suitable and attractive option in many cases for replacing missing units [5]. Successful tooth transplantation offers improved esthetics, arch form and dentofacial development, mastication, speech and arch integrity. A transplanted third molar also maintains a natural space, with little or no root resorption [6], alveolar bone volume 4, 7 and the morphology of the alveolar ridge through proprioceptive stimulation [4][5][6][7][8]. The outcome of this procedure depends on careful case selection and understanding of the biological principles. Teeth traditionally selected for this procedure are impacted maxillary canines that play an important role in dentofacial esthetic...

show abstract

Preapplication of Orthodontic Forces to the Donor Teeth Affects Periodontal Healing of Transplanted Teeth

Cited by 31 publications

References 22 publications

Autotransplantation of Teeth in 215 Patients

Autotransplantation of Teeth in 215 Patients

Application of orthodontic forces prior to autotransplantation – case reports

Auto Transplantation of a Mandibular Third Molar with Complete Root Development - A Case Report?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About