2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prebiotic ingestion does not improve gastrointestinal barrier function in burn patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17,25,29 Those clinical situations are clearly more severe than the mild biochemical cholestasis in our patients, who also had a less prominent increase in L/M ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,25,29 Those clinical situations are clearly more severe than the mild biochemical cholestasis in our patients, who also had a less prominent increase in L/M ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…13,[15][16][17]25 Sucrose was added to the lactulose/ mannitol solution as a permeability probe for absorption through the stomach and proximal duodenum. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Permeability tests were carried out starting at 08:00 to 09:00 AM. After an overnight fast, each person was asked to empty her bladder completely and then to drink a 450-mL solution containing 40 g sucrose, 7.5 g lactulose, and 2 g mannitol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional RCT was excluded because of repeated data 21 . Finally, 5 RCTs that met our inclusion criteria were included in the present meta‐analysis 22 26 . The flowchart of studies included in the meta‐analysis is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the diagnostic criteria for MODS and GI symptoms commonly seen in burned patients, GI dysfunction is summarized as follows: (1) abdominal distension: bowel sound was reduced and food intolerance exceeded more than 5 d; (2) stress ulcer: gastric fluid aspirated from the gastric tube appeared bloody macroscopically and gastric mucosa was erosive and ulcerative gastroendoscopically; (3) severe stress ulcer: blood loss exceeded 800 mL within 24 h; (4) alteration of intestinal microbiota: Gramnegative E.coli was amplified, and the bacillus/coccus ratio was greater than 10:1; and (5) enterogenic infection: highly suspected systemic infection occurred after ruling out wound surface, pulmonary and indwelling catheter infections [9,10] .…”
Section: Indexes For Assessing Gi Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%