2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prebiotics as immunostimulants in aquaculture: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
240
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 409 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
3
240
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacillus NP5 Rf R was able to increase survival rate of infected-tilapia by inducing GALT (gut associated lymphoid tissue) system in the digestive tract of tilapia which can enhance the fish immune responses through non-specific immune stimulation (Nayak, 2010). Whereas prebiotic MOS can work directly and indirectly in increasing fish non-specific immunity (Song et al, 2014). Prebiotic MOS works directly by interacting with mannose receptor in macrophages, in which it can activate the phagocytic activity of macrophages and it works indirectly by modulating the beneficial bacteria in the digestive tract of tilapia that can activate the fish immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacillus NP5 Rf R was able to increase survival rate of infected-tilapia by inducing GALT (gut associated lymphoid tissue) system in the digestive tract of tilapia which can enhance the fish immune responses through non-specific immune stimulation (Nayak, 2010). Whereas prebiotic MOS can work directly and indirectly in increasing fish non-specific immunity (Song et al, 2014). Prebiotic MOS works directly by interacting with mannose receptor in macrophages, in which it can activate the phagocytic activity of macrophages and it works indirectly by modulating the beneficial bacteria in the digestive tract of tilapia that can activate the fish immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…after an infection due to a more effective immune system [124]. This may reflect the consumption of the larval microbiota as well as chitin, which can act as a prebiotic in aquacultures [125,126]. Whereas probiotics are microbes that confer health benefits on the host, prebiotics are substances that induce the growth or activity of probiotic microbes [127].…”
Section: Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estas lectinas han sido descritas en varias especies de crustáceos Fenneropenaeus chinensis (Sun et al, 2008;Zhan et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2010) en Litopenaeus vannamei (Zhan et al, 2009a(Zhan et al, , 2009b. Song et al (2014) sugiere una interacción directa entre los MOS y el sistema inmune innato de crustáceos a través de algunos PRRs con afinidad por manosa (Sun et al, 2008;Arockiaraj et al, 2015), los cuales a su vez presentan alta especifidad de reconocimiento de PAMPs asociados a V. angillarum, E. coli y WSSV (Sun et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2009aZhang et al, , 2009bZhao et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2010). Se ha sugerido que estos PRRs están generalmente vinculados a la vía del complemento (Arockiaraj et al, 2015;Clark & Greenwood, 2016), pero existen carencias investigativas sobre este aspecto en particular (Clark & Greenwood, 2016).…”
Section: Vías Documentadasunclassified