Ancient Supercontinents and the Paleogeography of Earth 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818533-9.00008-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precambrian geomagnetic field—an overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 106 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the time-averaged axial dipole field has been persistently present throughout Earth's history remains unclear and is actively investigated, particularly for pre-Cambrian times (Evans, 2006;Biggin et al, 2020;Veikkolainen & Pesonen, 2021;Sears, 2022). More complex geomagnetic field morphologies with significant non-dipole contributions have often been invoked to explain unexpected paleomagnetic observations, such as discrepancies between paleomagnetic pole positions from different continents included in Pangea or the large dispersion of coeval poles in the Devonian (van der Boon et al, 2022) and Ediacaran (Abrajevitch & Van der Voo, 2010).…”
Section: The Geocentric Axial Dipole Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the time-averaged axial dipole field has been persistently present throughout Earth's history remains unclear and is actively investigated, particularly for pre-Cambrian times (Evans, 2006;Biggin et al, 2020;Veikkolainen & Pesonen, 2021;Sears, 2022). More complex geomagnetic field morphologies with significant non-dipole contributions have often been invoked to explain unexpected paleomagnetic observations, such as discrepancies between paleomagnetic pole positions from different continents included in Pangea or the large dispersion of coeval poles in the Devonian (van der Boon et al, 2022) and Ediacaran (Abrajevitch & Van der Voo, 2010).…”
Section: The Geocentric Axial Dipole Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%