2011
DOI: 10.1130/g31396.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precambrian plate tectonics: Seismic evidence from northern Hudson Bay, Canada

Abstract: The Canadian Shield is one of the largest exposures of Precambrian rocks on Earth. It is a mosaic of several Archean terranes that were brought together during a series of Paleoproterozoic orogens culminating in the so-called Trans-Hudson orogen, which is thought to have been similar to the Himalayan orogen in scale and nature. The tectonic evolution and lithospheric subdivisions of this region are poorly understood, but new seismic networks in northern Hudson Bay provide fresh opportunity to place constraints… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
52
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The region apparently affected by the Trans-Hudson Orogen is also extremely broad (≥ 250 km wide). These observations, coupled with splitting delay times of δt ≥ 1 s, were interpreted by Bastow et al (2011) as evidence that the Trans Hudson Orogen was Himalayan in scale (e.g., St-Onge et al, 2006). Splitting delay times at many stations in the Borborema Province are markedly lower than in northern Canada: only null observations are found at stations NBTA and NBMA, while δt is relatively low at NBLI and PFBR.…”
Section: Anisotropy In the Continental Interior Of The Borborema Provmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The region apparently affected by the Trans-Hudson Orogen is also extremely broad (≥ 250 km wide). These observations, coupled with splitting delay times of δt ≥ 1 s, were interpreted by Bastow et al (2011) as evidence that the Trans Hudson Orogen was Himalayan in scale (e.g., St-Onge et al, 2006). Splitting delay times at many stations in the Borborema Province are markedly lower than in northern Canada: only null observations are found at stations NBTA and NBMA, while δt is relatively low at NBLI and PFBR.…”
Section: Anisotropy In the Continental Interior Of The Borborema Provmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such tectonic deformation, developed during the collisions of the Brasiliano/Pan-African orogeny, would be expected to have imprinted a strong anisotropic fabric on the lithospheric mantle. For example, plate-scale terrane boundaries that delineate the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen in northern Canada are characterised by strong seismic anisotropic fossil fabrics, with fast polarisation directions that parallel the strike of the suture between two Archean continental blocks (Bastow et al, 2011). The region apparently affected by the Trans-Hudson Orogen is also extremely broad (≥ 250 km wide).…”
Section: Anisotropy In the Continental Interior Of The Borborema Provmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model implies a lack of pervasive deformation of the lower lithosphere during or after accretion. Coherent lithospheric fabrics that formed during the Archean and survived subsequent Proterozoic tectonic events have also been documented in other cratons, such as the Canadian Shield (Bastow et al, 2011;Kay et al, 1999;Snyder et al, 2013) and the Kaapvaal craton of South Africa (Silver et al, 2001).…”
Section: Implications For the Evolution Of Cratonic Lithospherementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Data from temporary deployments associated with the Hudson Bay Lithospheric Experiment (HuBLE) (e.g., Thompson et al, 2010Thompson et al, , 2011Pawlak et al, 2011;Steffen et al, 2012;Bastow et al, 2015) are also used. In total, 134 broadband seismic stations contribute to the CAN-HK crustal model, providing unparalleled coverage and resolution for the Canadian shield (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new model presented here, CAN-HK, utilizes new passive broadband deployments in the region (Eaton et al, 2005;Bastow et al, 2015). For several key tectonic features of the Canadian shield ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%