1961
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[351:pratrt]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precambrian Rocks and their Relationship to Laramide Structure along the East Flank of the Bighorn Mountains near Buffalo, Wyoming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hudson's main purpose was to evaluate the nature and extent of Precambrian control during Laramide deformation in the Piney Creek area (1969, p. 284), but his data on joints in Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks led him to conclude that a conjugate shear joint system and associated maximum principal stress oriented N52°E-S52°W represent early Laramide compressive deformation (p. 287). Other workers have established the existence of thrusting along the east flank of the central Big Horns structural segment (Bucher and others, 1934;Demorest, 1941;Hoppin, 1961), so the explanation of the Piney Creek lobe as a thrust block on July 7, 2015 memoirs.gsapubs.org Downloaded from appears to be consistent with these studies. Strike-slip movement would be one way to explain the lateral separation of the mountain front.…”
Section: Piney Creek Areasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hudson's main purpose was to evaluate the nature and extent of Precambrian control during Laramide deformation in the Piney Creek area (1969, p. 284), but his data on joints in Precambrian and Paleozoic rocks led him to conclude that a conjugate shear joint system and associated maximum principal stress oriented N52°E-S52°W represent early Laramide compressive deformation (p. 287). Other workers have established the existence of thrusting along the east flank of the central Big Horns structural segment (Bucher and others, 1934;Demorest, 1941;Hoppin, 1961), so the explanation of the Piney Creek lobe as a thrust block on July 7, 2015 memoirs.gsapubs.org Downloaded from appears to be consistent with these studies. Strike-slip movement would be one way to explain the lateral separation of the mountain front.…”
Section: Piney Creek Areasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Even though the basement was described as deforming en bloc, cross sections were drawn (1967, PI. 2) with the basement surface bending smoothly and conformably with the overlying bedding. Hoppin (1970), p. 2410) suggested that the difficulty of finding definitive exposures is the reason for this widespread practice. In any case, revised cross sections that obey the axiom of "do not fold the basement" (Stearns, 1975, p. 150) are given as conjectural representations of the Horn structures-interpretations that are consistent with the field data and with current ideas about the mechanical properties of the basement and its sedimentary veneer.…”
Section: Structure Of the Horn Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kliiftung mit Plumose-Strukturen kann einer bereits sehr fri,ih angelegten Gesteinsanisotropie folgen und zu Fehlschliissen bez[iglich der Orientierung der Hauptspannungsrichtungen nach den bekannten Kriterien fiir isotrope Medien ffihren (vergl. auch Pt~IcE (1975, 64ff) HOPPIN (1958), SP~NCEt~ (1959), WISE (1959, GP, IGGS & HANDIN (1960), Bt<ACE (1964 …”
Section: Zusammenfassung Und Diskussion Derunclassified
“…Lehman (1975) reports an orthogonal NW-NE near vertical set of Precambrian joints which correlates to those found in the sedimentary strata. A subhorizontal set of joints is also present, which Hoppin (1961) attributed to relict sheeting resulting from unloading. Hoppin and Palmquist (1965) report that the most common joint trend that occurs in the Bighorns is N 10-15 0 E associated with Precambrian shear foliation.…”
Section: Jointsmentioning
confidence: 99%