2021
DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2021.1882685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precariousness in Norway and Sweden: a comparative register-based study of longstanding precarious attachment to the labour market 1996–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies also demonstrated that the configuration of the labor market, gender, and welfare policies made work less precarious (Gauffin et al, 2021;Rasmussen et al, 2019). Such policies were built on strong social democratic politics shaped by organized labor and working-class movements confronting both states and capital.…”
Section: Confronting Precarious Work: Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies also demonstrated that the configuration of the labor market, gender, and welfare policies made work less precarious (Gauffin et al, 2021;Rasmussen et al, 2019). Such policies were built on strong social democratic politics shaped by organized labor and working-class movements confronting both states and capital.…”
Section: Confronting Precarious Work: Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, studies of Norway and Sweden indicated that women could move from part‐time to full‐time work and that immigrant workers showed stronger attachments to work with appropriate policies. These studies also demonstrated that the configuration of the labor market, gender, and welfare policies made work less precarious (Gauffin et al., 2021; Rasmussen et al., 2019). Such policies were built on strong social democratic politics shaped by organized labor and working‐class movements confronting both states and capital.…”
Section: Confronting Precarious Work: Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be seen as a broader concept that can be divided into more distinctive dimensions of precarious employment or one's life situation. At the individual level, precarity can be economic in terms of income, organisational in terms of working conditions, temporal (referring to uncertain employment periods and employment protections), and social (involving the social security available for individuals) (Rodgers and Rodgers, 1989;Kalleberg, 2014;Gauffin et al, 2021). Part-time work can be related to several of these dimensions.…”
Section: Theory and Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an overall phenomenon, Gauffin et al (2021) found that precarity, in terms of low income and unstable employment, declined in Norway from 2008 to 2015. However, Rasmussen et al (2019) concluded that precarity is associated with non-standard work in Norway as well as the other Nordic countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%