2018
DOI: 10.1017/ipo.2018.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Precariousness, youth and political participation: the emergence of a new political cleavage

Abstract: The article aims at disentangling the existing relation between job precariousness and political participation at the individual level illustrating that the former can be considered an emerging political cleavage. The authors apply an interpretive framework typical of political participation studies to an original data set composed of two groups of young workers (with precarious and open-ended contracts) in a big Italian post-industrial city, Turin. First, applying a confirmatory factor analysis, a typology of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Young people also have to face many modern economic risks (e.g. job insecurity), which also determine the level of their socio-political participation (Monticelli and Bassoli, 2018). However, establishing a democratic political system is mainly based on encouraging the development of political culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people also have to face many modern economic risks (e.g. job insecurity), which also determine the level of their socio-political participation (Monticelli and Bassoli, 2018). However, establishing a democratic political system is mainly based on encouraging the development of political culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many past empirical studies examining the causes and predictors of participation in both institutionalized and non-institutionalized politics among young people have also identified factors such as income levels, employment status/condition, level of education, marital status and satisfaction with life and household income as among the strongest predictors of political participation (Quintelier, 2007;Dalton, 2009;Monticelli and Bassoli, 2019;Tzannatos, 2021). While these are clearly not the only known reasons for political participation, as there are also incentive-based motivations (Whiteley and Seyd, 2002;Teorell, 2006;Bob-Milliar, 2012), socioeconomic factors, nevertheless, seem to hold particular prominence in the case of young people.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Life Cycle Effect and Youth Bulgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two diametrically opposed theories of political participation provide the theoretical framework for the study. On the one hand, grievance theory argues that when people (including young people) feel relatively deprived, due to unfavorable socioeconomic and political conditions within a country, they are likely to express their displeasure with the political system through acts such as protests and conflicts (Gurr, 1970;Muller, 1979;Vrablikova, 2014;Asingo, 2018;Monticelli and Bassoli, 2019). Youth bulge is seen to exacerbate this likelihood through the creation of a large pool of unemployed and low earning young people, who face stiff competition among themselves for limited labor market opportunities, particularly where they are educated (Brunello, 2010;Ganie, 2020;Weber, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Life Cycle Effect and Youth Bulgementioning
confidence: 99%