“…(ii) The emergence of a transnational space, anchored chiefly but not exclusively in the Global South, that problematizes anew design's embeddedness in global historical relations of power and domination, variously explored in terms of design's relation to histories of colonialism and imperialism, its functioning within the modern/colonial matrix of power, the geopolitics of knowledge (eurocentrism), racism, and patriarchal capitalist colonial modernity. This second feature is attested by novel framings of design praxes, such as those going on under the rubrics of decolonial design (Schultz, 2017;Schultz et al, 2018); designs of, for, by and from the South (Gutiérrez, 2015a(Gutiérrez, , 2015bAnsari, 2016;Fry, 2017b;Escobar, 2017) 2 ; design by other names; the decolonization of design (Tunstall, 2013;Ansari, 2016;Tlostanova, 2017;Vásquez, 2017); indigenous and multicultural design and visual sovereignty 3 ; alter-design (López-Garay and Lopera, 2017); design in the borderlands (Kalantidou and Fry, 2014); and autonomous design (Escobar, 2018). It should be stressed that these trends often overlap; they are diverse and heterogeneous, in some cases even within each trend.…”