PRECEPT: a framework for ethical digital forensics investigations

Abstract

PurposeCyber-enabled crimes are on the increase, and law enforcement has had to expand many of their detecting activities into the digital domain. As such, the field of digital forensics has become far more sophisticated over the years and is now able to uncover even more evidence that can be used to support prosecution of cyber criminals in a court of law. Governments, too, have embraced the ability to track suspicious individuals in the online world. Forensics investigators are driven to gather data exhaustively, being under pressure to provide law enforcement with sufficient evidence to secure a conviction.Yet, there are concerns about the ethics and justice of untrammeled investigations on a number of levels. On an organizational level, unconstrained investigations could interfere with, and damage, the organization's right to control the disclosure of their intellectual capital. On an individual level, those being investigated could easily have their legal privacy rights violated by forensics investigations. On a societal level, there might be a sense of injustice at the perceived inequality of current practice in this domain.This paper argues the need for a practical, ethically grounded approach to digital forensic investigations, one that acknowledges and respects the privacy rights of individuals and the intellectual capital disclosure rights of organizations, as well as acknowledging the needs of law enforcement. The paper derives a set of ethical guidelines, and then maps these onto a forensics investigation framework. The framework to expert review in two stages is subjected, refining the framework after each stage. The paper concludes by proposing the refined ethically grounded digital forensics investigation framework. The treatise is primarily UK based, but the concepts presented here have international relevance and applicability.Design/methodology/approachIn this paper, the lens of justice theory is used to explore the tension that exists between the needs of digital forensic investigations into cybercrimes on the one hand, and, on the other, individuals' rights to privacy and organizations' rights to control intellectual capital disclosure.FindingsThe investigation revealed a potential inequality between the practices of digital forensics investigators and the rights of other stakeholders. That being so, the need for a more ethically informed approach to digital forensics investigations, as a remedy, is highlighted and a framework proposed to provide this.Research limitations/implicationsThe proposed ethically informed framework for guiding digital forensics investigations suggests a way of re-establishing the equality of the stakeholders in this arena, and ensuring that the potential for a sense of injustice is reduced.Originality/valueJustice theory is used to highlight the difficulties in squaring the circle between the rights and expectations of all stakeholders in the digital forensics arena. The outcome is the forensics investigation guideline, PRECEpt: Privacy-Respecting EthiCal framEwork, which provides the basis for a re-aligning of the balance between the requirements and expectations of digital forensic investigators on the one hand, and individual and organizational expectations and rights, on the other.

Forensic Accounting and Fraud Detection: A Review of Techniques in the Digital Age

“…In this section, we explore the compliance with regulatory standards in digital forensic accounting, the ethical challenges and responsibilities faced by professionals, and the delicate balance required between privacy and investigative needs. Forensic accountants engaged in digital investigations must adhere to a diverse set of international and national regulations (Ferguson et al,2020). These may include data protection laws, financial reporting standards, and industry-specific regulations.…”

Computer Forensics Framework for Efficient and Lawful Privacy-Preserved Investigation

“…It is also different from the privacy acts, which are more required to be enforced in DF. In 2020, Ferguson et al [51] proposed a framework called PRECEPT, which provides a guideline for ethically dealing with digital evidence during the investigation process. Like the works proposed in [46], this framework presents general or high-level guidelines.…”

A Comprehensive Review of the Evolution and Future Directions of Digital Forensic Investigation Model

“…These requirements guarantee that digital forensics investigations comply with regulations protecting human rights, data privacy, and intellectual property rights [44]. Ethical requirements ensure that digital forensics professionals adhere to standards of conduct and integrity, promoting impartiality, accuracy, and trustworthiness in their work [45].…”

“…Additionally, challenges and limitations associated with implementing digital forensic investigation models in the practical legal system need to be addressed due to the complex nature of digital evidence and the legal system. Ethical considerations also need to be considered when implementing digital forensic investigation models for practicality in the legal system [5]. Finally, to measure the effectiveness and efficiency of digital forensic investigation models in court cases, it is important to determine how it can be done.…”