Forty-six strains of Malassezia spp. with atypical biochemical features were isolated from 366 fresh clinical isolates from human subjects and dogs. Isolates obtained in this study included 2 (4.7%) lipiddependent M. pachydermatis isolates; 1 (2.4%) precipitate-producing and 6 (14.6%) non-polyethoxylated castor oil (Cremophor EL)-assimilating M. furfur isolates; and 37 (34.3%) M. slooffiae isolates that were esculin hydrolyzing, 17 (15.7%) that were non-tolerant of growth at 40°C, and 2 (1.9%) that assimilated polyethoxylated castor oil. Although their colony morphologies and sizes were characteristic on CHROMagar Malassezia medium (CHROM), all strains of M. furfur developed large pale pink and wrinkled colonies, and all strains of M. slooffiae developed small (<1 mm) pale pink colonies on CHROM. These atypical strains were distinguishable by the appearance of their colonies grown on CHROM. Three clinically important Malassezia species, M. globosa, M. restricta, and M. furfur, were correctly identified by their biochemical characteristics and colony morphologies. The results presented here indicate that our proposed identification system will be useful as a routine tool for the identification of clinically important Malassezia species in clinical laboratories.Members of the genus Malassezia are among the microbiological flora of the skin of homoiothermic animals. Most species of this genus are lipid-dependent yeasts which colonize the seborrheic part of the skin, and they have been reported to be associated with pityriasis versicolor, seborrheic dermatitis, Malassezia folliculitis, and atopic dermatitis (1,6,19,20,24,29). Although M. furfur was previously thought to be the causative agent or trigger factor in all of these skin disorders, Guého et al. (9) reclassified this genus into five species in 1996. Malassezia has since been reclassified into seven species based on molecular biological analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA/ RNA (9, 10), and the results agreed with those of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA analyses (30). As members of the genus Malassezia share similar morphological and biochemical characteristics, it was thought that differentiating between them based on phenotypic features would be difficult. While molecular biological techniques are the most reliable for the identification of Malassezia, they are not available in most clinical laboratories. Therefore, culture methods for the identification of Malassezia species are required. Some of these identification or differentiation methods have been reported previously. Guillot et al. reported a method of identification based on lipid usage pattern, catalase reaction, growth temperature, and cell shape (11). Hammer and Riley reported the production of a precipitate by some Malassezia strains on Dixon's agar (12); for example, M. furfur, M. obtusa, and M. slooffiae were precipitate-negative strains, while M. sympodialis and M. globosa were precipitate-positive strains. Mayser et al. reported that some Malassezia species hydrolyzed esculin and assimilated pol...